With the latest merge into the master branch of this
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/26703, it seems that the core framework
is heading in a direction where functional/system tests are also being
accepted in a more formal way. If this is the case, imo, it would make
sense to also have a RAI
This seems to break the STI :-( Activity1 is not found as an STI class
--
Maurizio De Santis
2017-02-24 19:08 GMT+01:00 Jason Fleetwood-Boldt :
>
> not a Class within a Class, a Class within a Module, like so:
>
> module Activity
> class Activity1 < ActivityBase
> end
> end
>
> or, alterna
Yes, as I had explained in my previous email, you will absolutely need to
rename the objects in the 'type' column when using STI/polymorphism. There are
several other things to consider as well when making this kind of an object
name change.
You can do this directly in SQL (it would be fastes
