Sorry, I was being unclear there.
I think it might be sensible to convert .select(“users.*, sum(baz))” to the
expanded form on the ruby side using the column cache. That way you get the
functionality you want without introducing a new API.
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
> On 16 Nov 2019, at 12:43
I think it’s worth considering implementing per database, as the major ones
all have something that’ll work and the keys don’t need to be stable across
different data store implementations.
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
> On 31 Oct 2019, at 6:17 am, Aaron Lipman wrote:
>
>
> Thanks
The full collection could be millions of records. Fetching the ids to hash
might not be an option either, unless they can be hashed on the database side.
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
> On 29 Oct 2019, at 4:22 am, Aaron Lipman wrote:
>
>
> Hi Marc & Richard,
>
> I'd categori
This doesn’t work for many languages, and only works for English if you format
your copy to match (ex: “you don’t have any bookmarks” vs “you have no
bookmarks”)
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 5:49 am, Marc Köhlbrugge wrote:
>
>
> I wonder how many Rails apps use i1
Currently, if you call stylesheet_packs_with_chunks_tag and pass a chunk
with no CSS, you get an exception.
This is generally a good thing, since it stops you from misspelling your
entry point names.
However, in the specific case of entry points that have JS but no CSS, I
think it makes more
not working on CTEs would notice that this change exists.
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Rafael Mendonça França wrote:
> Cool! I think the hard work is already done. But I still find it hard
> to justify this in the framework. It is a feature that is out of Rails
> for
ere(id: {post_ids: :post_id})
Would a patch supporting this syntax be accepted?
Thanks,
Daniel Heath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i