I didn't realise I wasn't supposed to be using html_safe. Perhaps the
documentation should be updated to make this clearer?
On 6 February 2015 at 16:50, Rafael Mendonça França wrote:
> Renaming this method is not an option.
>
> The main reason is: it should not be used by end users. It is an
> i
In years of using Rails it has never occurred to me that the name
"html_safe" can be ambiguous until just now when I read this thread.
When is a developer going to stumble across this method without knowing
what it means and insert it blindly into their code? If it really *is
*ambiguous,
peopl
