I seem to remember that Tilt didn't support encodings, but maybe this
has been fixed?
/Jonas
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Nick Sutterer wrote:
> Hey friends,
>
> I was wondering what is the current opinion on using tilt in
> ActionView? Right now, there's a lot of code in AV::Template/
> Tem
Sounds like this is probably due to Rails returning a 304 not
modified, which doesn't have a Content-Length header. ActiveResource
should be able to handle that, or it shouldn't send an
if-modified-since header if it can't deal with the 304.
/Jonas
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Sidu Ponnappa w
Definitely +1 for Jasmine
It's easily the best test framework for JavaScript. I wrote a wrapper
around it called Evergreen, which has gained a little traction. You
should check it out for inspiration I think, since it does a lot of
things very differently than most other similar libraries. I think
Have you considered SDoc? Imho it's the nicest overall documentation
template so far. The search works incredibly well. You can see it in
action here: http://railsapi.com/doc/rails-v2.3.8/
/Jonas
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Xavier Noria wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Hongli Lai
It's great to see someone finally take charge of this! I still don't
have the greatest grasp of character encodings, but what you're
suggesting sounds good.
Maybe one additional thing: make all generators put the magic comment
with the standard encoding at the top of all source files they create.
JSON is not XML. What you are proposing is to use JSON as though it
were XML, which doesn't make any sense in my oppinion. Let them each
play to their strengths.
/Jonas
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, James MacAulay wrote:
> The way Rails handles root nodes in JSON and XML serialization is
> inc
ramework", here it is:
>
> http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/51730792ca9
>
>
> On Apr 16, 5:30 pm, Mislav Marohnić wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 13:44, Jonas Nicklas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > @users = @users.select(&:admin?) if @admins
Why not rewrite that as:
if @admins_only
@users.select(&:admin?).sort
else
@users.sort
end
or even
@users = @users.select(&:admin?) if @admins_only
@users.sort
I think that is infinitely easier to read and understand (it took me a
while to figure out what the hell your code was doing). Just
Unfortunately, there's no way to know if a string is a literal or not,
short of parsing the Ruby, and considering the sheer number of string
literals in Ruby, that seems very infeasible.
/Jonas
P.S.: off the top of my head:
"word"
'word'
%(word)
%[word]
%{word}
%q(word)
%q[word]
%q{word}
%Q(word
Agreed, I can't see any reason why it *shouldn't* be tagged. It's not
like tags are a limited resource.
/Jonas
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mislav Marohnić
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 23:29, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
>>
>> Generally release candidates are tagged, but the beta won't be. The
Looks good. Will be nice not to have to worry about XSS so much anymore.
Out of curiosity, what is the reasoning behind not using the 'taint'
mechanism built into Ruby. Is it because this is more of a white-list
approach, whereas 'taint' is more of a black-list approach?
/Jonas
On Tue, Jul 28, 2
It looks from the stack trace like ActiveScaffold is trying to
alias_method_chain a method that no longer exists, you are probably using an
old version of ActiveScaffold, try upgrading.
/Jonas
P.S.: The Ruby on Rails Talk list at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk is the more appropr
I think the current behaviour is correct. It seems to me that :as changes
the url and *only* the url. If it starts to have implications on the
controller, that would be very confusing. Say you would use :as to provid
l10n names for routes, this is something we do very often. So we have a
route like
Wouldn't all of these problems be solved by an identity map? Wouldn't that
be a better solution than trying to hack this on the existing system?
/Jonas
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
> > FWIW, that's basically how Sequel handles it, with the :reciprocal
> > option,
14 matches
Mail list logo
