On Saturday, April 2, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Ryan Bigg wrote:
There was a thread a little earlier in the year about maintaining the official
Rails plugins. It would seem that rails_upgrade has been left by the wayside,
with pull requests dating back as early as September last year. It's mentioned
in t
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Santiago Pastorino
>
> Please take a look below and verify that everything is ok. I still
> need some URLs to the repos and also that the owners give commit
> access to the fellow maintainers.
>
>
Looks good to me Santiago. Thanks for organizing this effort.
-Mark
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Santiago Pastorino wrote:
> For example we can give Chris Lerum country_select if Chris provides
> push access to Mark Turner.
>
>
Sounds great.
-Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Santiago Pastorino wrote:
>
> Please reply telling us which project are you interested in and send
> us the url of your fork.
>
>
I'd also be willing to take over in_place_editing
https://github.com/amerine/in_place_editing
--
You received this message because you
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Santiago Pastorino wrote:
> We are looking for maintainers for the rails plugins listed in
> http://github.com/rails except arel, jquery-ujs, prototype-ujs,
> rails_xss and rails itself :).
> The idea is that use your fork as official and make the rails ones
> point
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
>
> Added.
>
> Let's hear some other nominations and seconds.
I'd like to nominate myself (amerine). I get fairly annoyed of the spam and
would like to help control that trash.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:02 PM, rails.impaired
wrote:
>
> What is the current "Rails Way" to design views?
>
> What direction is Rails moving with regard to views?
You might want to send your message to rails-talk
(http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk)
As far as direction goes... no
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Pratik wrote:
>
> IIRC, it's different on 1.9.
>
I don't think its a 1.9 thing. It had something to do with strings
being treated as Enumerable. See this:
>> Array("helo \n world")
=> ["helo \n", " world"]
>> Array.wrap("helo \n world")
=> ["helo \n world"]
-M
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Paul
Gillard wrote:
> Currently ActiveRecord::Base overrides #clone and creates clones using
> #new. This means newly cloned objects are initialized via a
> combination of #clone and #initialize instead of via #initialize_copy.
> Is the Rails core group interested
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Mislav
Marohnić wrote:
> Oh, you might wanna take a look at this then:
> http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/01d92021e69f54def1ec8103b2b99f907dd88ec4
Good point.
I'm doing HTML5 stuff on my own, and I guess I haven't seen any
discussions here regarding switchin
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Trevor Turk wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 10:37 am, Ryan Bates wrote:
>> It's invalid in XHTML Strict to not wrap inline elements in a block
>> element (such as a or ). But I just realized scaffolding uses
>> XHTML Transitional so it's not technically invalid there.
>
>
On Aug 8, 8:19 pm, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> In Rails 2.x, if you have an XML template, and try to render a template
> that does not have an XML version, but does have an HTML version, it
> will be rendered. XML and HTML are just examples; this is true for any
> two mime types.
>
> Is this behavior im
On Jul 19, 12:50 pm, "toamitku...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> We have 2 models... say for eg: Person and Contractor... Based on
> different criteria (office, department, interest etc) we need to show
> paginated result of both people and contractors which will be all
> sorted by name.
>
> Right now, the
13 matches
Mail list logo
