. We
need functionality like this to be able to gracefully fail templates
over from user customized ones to the defaults delivered with Active
Scaffold.
I'm wondering the best way to go about requesting that some feature
like this is added to the standard "API" of the view
ifempty?
Pascal Ehlert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about adding some method #foo instead that returns nil if the
> string is blank and self otherwise, so that you can do:
>
> self.email.foo || self.name
>
> This looks slightly better and more intuitive to me, if we can figure
> out a descriptive name
I just made a patch and wanted to see if some people could verify it.
It's attached to the ticket at:
http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/1801-testsession-and-abstractstore-delete-and-update-methods-do-not-match-in-parameter-count#ticket-1801-4
Basically, with the
given branch (like
2.2-stable). I think this would do 2 things:
1) Encourage more people to have their apps in CI
2) Cause people to see changes in the core that affect their apps. This
would get more, and more immediate feedback to the core team about commits.
-Mike Gaffney
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009
It's funny because the functionality is the only thing omitted from the
email.
-Mike
Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On 28 Dec 2008, at 17:53, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
>
>> Frederick Cheung wrote:
>>
>>> On 27 Dec 2008, at 15:10, Matt Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
The method ha
