or an array itself.
--
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
On 6 May 2016 at 00:29:29, Andrey Molchanov (neod...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi all,
In some places new array creates as a Array(). If we replace it to a [], we
increase performance about 1.7 times:
def old_slow
Array(123)
end
def new_fast
[123]
end
B
that this
support exists? If so, what kind of a scenario would still need it?
[1]:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/392eeecc11a291e406db927a18b75f41b2658253
--
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
On 5 January 2016 at 15:46:33, alexander.maz...@gmail.com
(alexander.maz...@gmail.com) wrote:
Here is one
+1
There is even a name for that "magic `true`" parameter: "The Boolean Trap"
http://ariya.ofilabs.com/2011/08/hall-of-api-shame-boolean-trap.html
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Prem Sichanugrist
wrote:
> How do you guys feel about adding supp
break applications that are
using it.
--
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
On 6 February 2015 at 17:50:24, Rafael Mendonça França
(rafaelmfra...@gmail.com) wrote:
Renaming this method is not an option.
The main reason is: it should not be used by end users. It is an implementation
detail of the framework
and experienced programmers.
--
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
On 6 February 2015 at 17:24:17, Nicolas Cavigneaux (n...@bounga.org) wrote:
Le 6 févr. 2015 à 16:21, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt a écrit :
>
> Is Rails' API coded for the neophyte or the experienced dev?
>
> The eternal questio
Hi Gabe,
I'd recommend the small and very versatile andand gem for the use case that you
mention. In that case, the use case becomes:
params[:order].andand[:shipping_info].andand[:country]
loosing very little expressiveness, not having to revert to rescuing
exceptions, etc.
Best,
--
er, if there is any interest/willingness to do so.
Best,
Ufuk Kayserilioglu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrai
