On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 6:35:48 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
>
> But I find this more consisent:
>
> post[:"dotted.column"].like('zomg%')
>
> than this:
>
> post.__send__(:"dotted.column").like('zomg%')
>
> You could actually support both syntaxes, but if you do so you wouldn't
Em 10-12-2012 19:40, Ernie Miller escreveu:
On Monday, December 10, 2012 4:08:06 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
What if a column is named "class"? I'd rather prefer something
like that:
Post.where { |post|
post[:title].like('zomg%') | post[:class].like('bbq%')
On Monday, December 10, 2012 4:08:06 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
> What if a column is named "class"? I'd rather prefer something like that:
>
> Post.where { |post|
>post[:title].like('zomg%') | post[:class].like('bbq%')
> }
>
>
In Squeel's specific case, the DSL object is a
Em 07-12-2012 11:44, Ernie Miller escreveu:
...
While the most common usage of Squeel is via instance_eval, and I know
core is traditionally not in favor of such dark arts, it's perfectly
possible to use Squeel syntax without instance_eval, as in:
Post.where { |post|
post.title.like('zomg%'
Hi all,
Back in the Rails 3.0 days, there was thought and discussion about how the
AR query API might be improved to support more advanced queries, and in
general make better use of some of the capabilities of ARel. I'd had some
brief discussions with Pratik at the time, during which he mention
