On 31-10-2010 20:21, Aaron Patterson wrote:
...
So why don't use use a mutex and wrap your saves with that? I don't see
a reason to change AR API for this.
...
Ok, I already realized there is no interest from the Rails core team to
integrate concurrency features in Rails and maybe I'll creat
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:28:50AM -0200, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> On 30-10-2010 15:55, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> >...
> >>When listening to Yehuda's talk about development on the client
> >>side, which was really great by the way, I got really worried when
> >>he commented about some Rails
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Matt Jones wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Xavier Noria wrote:
>
>> Perhaps you could even wrap AR::Base#save in your application so that
>> if violation of that constraint is detected (assuming the exception
>> has information that allows you to do that),
On Oct 31, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Xavier Noria wrote:
> If one cares about this edge case, I think the best approach is the
> one we use for model IDs: let the database take care of it. Set a
> UNIQUE constraint, and deal with it in the application.
>
> Perhaps you could even wrap AR::Base#save in y
If one cares about this edge case, I think the best approach is the
one we use for model IDs: let the database take care of it. Set a
UNIQUE constraint, and deal with it in the application.
Perhaps you could even wrap AR::Base#save in your application so that
if violation of that constraint is det
I might be wrong in understanding the problem, but I believe I would use
transactions to solve the problems you're describing. I don't see the need
to manage locks manually.
Allen Madsen
http://www.allenmadsen.com
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> On 30-10-2010
On 30-10-2010 15:55, Aaron Patterson wrote:
...
When listening to Yehuda's talk about development on the client
side, which was really great by the way, I got really worried when
he commented about some Rails validations not being concurrent-safe
nor even thread-safe.
While I can understand it
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:56:53PM -0200, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> I'm finally back to Vitória, after a great time in RubyConfBR, even
> though I've been target of jokes from Aaron Patterson regarding
> Rspec questions due my questions to David Chelimsky in a non-related
> talk from him. B
I'm finally back to Vitória, after a great time in RubyConfBR, even
though I've been target of jokes from Aaron Patterson regarding Rspec
questions due my questions to David Chelimsky in a non-related talk from
him. But that's ok, it was fun and I deserved it :)
When listening to Yehuda's tal
