Hi Zach,
On Feb 26, 2007, at 3:15 PM, zdennis wrote:
>> I like Ernie's suggestion of a SqlStatement-like object, or even
>> better,
>> settling on some duck-typing conventions for sql-like strings.
>>
>> SqlString < String could also hold its bind variables. The
>> database adapter
>> could t
On Feb 25, 5:21 pm, "Jeremy Kemper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/25/07, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There seems to be two ways to handle query generation which are better
> > then the existing methods.
> >1 - Generate queries inside the adapters
> >2 - Register queries to
> I like Ernie's suggestion of a SqlStatement-like object, or even better,
> settling on some duck-typing conventions for sql-like strings.
>
> SqlString < String could also hold its bind variables. The database adapter
> could translate that to whatever native support for bound parameters, even
On 2/25/07, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There seems to be two ways to handle query generation which are better
> then the existing methods.
>1 - Generate queries inside the adapters
>2 - Register queries to be associated with certain adapters.
>
> Currently I prefer #2 because it
On Feb 24, 8:36 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> > > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
>
> > Congratulations, it's a bu
On Feb 23, 3:59 pm, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> We've spoken about this several times in the past, and it's still one
> of our goals for the rails 2.0 release.The query generation code
> is kinda ugly, and frankly a lot of it is in the wrong place.
>
> We should b
On 2/25/07, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> > > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
> >
> > Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :)
On Feb 24, 2007, at 5:36 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
>
> Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :)
>
> Will the
On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
>
> Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :)
Will the change make the Abstract Adapter really abstract whil
I'd like to see the condition methods moved out of ActiveRecord and
into a more general location...
condition_block?
evaluate_condition
They currently reside in validations.rb
The functionality they provide can be used nicely in ActionController
and possibly other places where class methods acc
> Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :).
> I've written and
> released some ActiveRecord extensions/plugins [0] and as well as
> posted some thoughts on ActiveRecord's mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
