On Oct 28, 12:43 pm, "Rick DeNatale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to a great suggestion by Josh Susser. I've spent the past two
> days completely re-working the code I submitted in the eariler patch.
>
> The new patch;http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10012
> accomplishes the same result
Thanks to a great suggestion by Josh Susser. I've spent the past two
days completely re-working the code I submitted in the eariler patch.
The new patch; http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10012
accomplishes the same results, but with a much better api.
The earlier patch added a new option for u
On 10/26/07, Josh Susser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you wanted something friendlier than a SQL joins clause string,
> like the hash/array syntax used by the :include option, that could be
> a good alternate syntax for :joins. Much more Rails-like too. I'd
> be interested in seeing somethin
On 10/26/07, Josh Susser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> > Prompted by some discussion on rails-talk last week, I worked up a
> > patch to add an option to ActiveRecord::Base#find which allows
> > associations to be :included for purposes of th
On Oct 24, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> Prompted by some discussion on rails-talk last week, I worked up a
> patch to add an option to ActiveRecord::Base#find which allows
> associations to be :included for purposes of the where clause, but
> defers instantiating the included associa
Sorry I intended this to go to the rails-talk list but gmail outsmarted me.
On 10/24/07, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prompted by some discussion on rails-talk last week, I worked up a
> patch to add an option to ActiveRecord::Base#find which allows
> associations to be :included f
