Jon,
I would make sure this currently merges into master and send a pull
request on github with the lighthouse ticket in the comments... Need
get more eyes on it.
On Nov 17, 3:40 am, Jon Leighton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In October I worked on a patch for a long-requested feature:
> associations that
The patch has now been "verified" on Lighthouse. I.e. 3 people have
tested and +1ed it. I've done a pull request here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/121
I merged latest master over the weekend and will continue to merge as
necessary to keep it up to date.
Jon
On Nov 29, 1:42 am, lardawge
+1 for the usefulness of Jon's patch. During a previous project I was
very disappointed to find that Rails didn't support nested :through
associations. Besides my own experiences, a quick search on Google for
"nested has many through associations" shows a litany of blog posts
and discussions on hac
Hi all,
Jose has responded on the pull request:
===
Hey mate, thanks for the pull request. But could you please send this
request to Rails mailing list and get feedback from more people?
At first, I am -1 on this feature. Rails has_many :through, without
b
I'm very much in favor of hmt working to an infinite depth. From my own
experience as well as responding to others, I know it's something that
people just expect to work.
I'm also concerned about bugs, but I like your suggestion Jon.
On Dec 1, 2010 12:18 PM, "Jon Leighton" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Jo
+1 for sorting bugs out and commiting this. HMT just helps doing some
associations where it would be hard to do. Even if it is not fool proof,
allowing us to associate models further where needed is welcomed. I have
been in a couple of projects where coding would be easier with this patch.
On Wed,
