Re: [Rails-core] Re: Rails 3 : basic routes

2010-02-15 Thread Chad Woolley
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > The catch-all route let to a series of faulty patterns such a > hide_action and verification. At it's core, the router is the > appropriate place to limit request that go onto the controllers. Agreed. Many a 2.x production app spews exception

Re: [Rails-core] Re: Rails 3 : basic routes

2010-02-15 Thread Yehuda Katz
The catch-all route let to a series of faulty patterns such a hide_action and verification. At it's core, the router is the appropriate place to limit request that go onto the controllers. In this case, removing the default route allows us to simplify the explanation of how you should go about "h

Re: [Rails-core] Re: Rails 3 : basic routes

2010-02-15 Thread Allen Madsen
I agree with Trey. People learning Rails should be learning the conventions, not the exceptions. As for the learning curve, I think it is simple enough to generate a scaffold. Allen Madsen http://www.allenmadsen.com On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Trey wrote: > Hey Anthony, > > Great observat

[Rails-core] Re: Rails 3 : basic routes

2010-02-15 Thread Trey
Hey Anthony, Great observation here. The only thing I would say is to define "beginners" and how you want to teach them. We're all being pushed towards a more RESTful design - both by Rails and by web development in general. So it seems that a framework has to make a decision - do we make it eas