So, I post this message to rubyonrails-talk?
On 1ζ24ζ₯, εεΎ3:50, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Syndication doesn't require any support from Rails
> core. Let's move this conversation over to the
> general list.
>
> --- jordip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > See this one bette
Syndication doesn't require any support from Rails
core. Let's move this conversation over to the
general list.
--- jordip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> See this one better:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Services_for_Remote_Portlets
>
> Basically allows code to become an "object" t
See this one better:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Services_for_Remote_Portlets
Basically allows code to become an "object" that can be used locally
or not.
For instance :
http://www.google.com/ig
I have not idea about how was that implemented but with portlets you
can have any of the "widge
On Jan 23, 2008 7:41 PM, Lawrence Pit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > the portlet standard
>
> which standard? ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portlet i suppose.
--
Rick Olson
http://lighthouseapp.com
http://weblog.techno-weenie.net
http://mephistoblog.com
--~--~-~--~~--
> the portlet standard
which standard? ;)
anyways, I don't think an implementation of whatever standard you choose
is within the scope of rails.
Regards,
Lawrence
> Hi,
>
> I want to know if there is something in the roadmap (I have not seen
> anything in the trac) about portlet support o
On Jan 23, 2008 6:31 PM, jordip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to know if there is something in the roadmap (I have not seen
> anything in the trac) about portlet support on rails.
> What I mean is a rails application or part of it being marked as
> portlet and automatically the
