[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Event.observe 1800% slower in IE?

2007-08-08 Thread Chippy
Just FYI, I tested this in IE7 and got between 4 and 8 times slower (rather inconsistent). On Aug 8, 9:22 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an application that relies heavily on Event.observe, but I'm > finding that in IE (tested mostly in 6), it is about 18

[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Storing order of sortable objects in RoR

2007-07-18 Thread Chippy
Sortable has a method similar to sequence named serialize. More details are here: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/Sortable.serialize but what you really want to know is that this is the format that post expects. If you serialize both lists and give each its own proper key you can

[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Get Sortable's moved object

2007-07-03 Thread Chippy
Ah, I guess that works. Merci beaucoup. On Jul 3, 12:09 am, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chippy a écrit : > > > Hello there, > > Is there a way to get the id or similar of the moved object when the > > onUpdate function is called? > &g

[Rails-spinoffs] Get Sortable's moved object

2007-07-02 Thread Chippy
Hello there, Is there a way to get the id or similar of the moved object when the onUpdate function is called? Thanks in advance! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To

[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Sortables

2007-07-02 Thread Chippy
Sorry for all the replys.. It occurs to me that all the bug reports and such that I saw were for problems with second and third level, whereas I'm having trouble even on the first level... On Jul 2, 4:45 pm, Chippy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a bunch of searching and fou

[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Sortables

2007-07-02 Thread Chippy
/5/25/script-aculo-us-1-7-1-beta-3) with a fix, but that didn't work either. Should I post another bug report? On Jul 2, 2:36 pm, Chippy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure did. Only options I have set: "tree: true, dropOnEmpty: true" > > On Jul 2, 2:28 pm, dasboe <[EMAI

[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Sortables

2007-07-02 Thread Chippy
Sure did. Only options I have set: "tree: true, dropOnEmpty: true" On Jul 2, 2:28 pm, dasboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > did you set dropOnEmpty for sortable options to true? > > http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/Sortable.create --~--~-~--~~~---~--~---

[Rails-spinoffs] Sortables

2007-07-02 Thread Chippy
Hey, I have a Sortable set up with a tree, and I am having a bit of trouble getting this to work properly. Here's the basic problem: When I have a list (ul) and it is empty (whether it is empty from the native HTML or from dragging elements out), I cannot put list elements in it. Am I doing som