I think we are agree
>
> Just to clarify, I am not saying "never dynamically add event
> listeners", I'm just saying to keep an open mind and consider adding
> them at the server in some cases instead of at the client.
>
I agree with you
>
> And by
> "add them at the server" I am not saying the
On Jun 11, 5:05 pm, "Jean-Philippe Encausse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> To be sure I correctly understand your answer: Inline events are
> events declared in the HTML ?
> Click Me
Yes.
> or stuff
No.
> Well I agree this code is fast because it is directly bind to
> function. But as you sai
To be sure I correctly understand your answer: Inline events are
events declared in the HTML ?
Click Me
or stuff
Well I agree this code is fast because it is directly bind to
function. But as you said there is pros and cons. I wasn't thinking
about this Web 0.1 feature because:
1. You mix HTML a
There are no silver bullets.
Both event delegation and inline event handlers have their pros and
cons. The benefits of delegation could be easily outweighed by the
time it takes to traverse a deep document (think frequent events like
mousemove/over/out, window's "resize", etc.) Inline event handle
On Jun 10, 7:07 pm, "Jean-Philippe Encausse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A little question about "Why designer of JavaScript library are
> designing that way ?"
>
> 1. Context
>
> I'm developper on a CMS using Prototype/Scriptaculous as first
> JavaScript layer.
> - The CMS is using many librar
