On Jan 17, 10:50 am, Wizz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 4:02 pm, Peter De Berdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 16 Jan 2008, at 15:36, Brian Williams wrote:
>
> > > But this begs me to ask...do (specifically, which) mobile browsers
> > > support deflated content? Those browsers are
On Jan 16, 4:02 pm, Peter De Berdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2008, at 15:36, Brian Williams wrote:
>
> > But this begs me to ask...do (specifically, which) mobile browsers
> > support deflated content? Those browsers are going to be the ones
> > most affected by the uncompressed file
On 16 Jan 2008, at 15:36, Brian Williams wrote:
> But this begs me to ask...do (specifically, which) mobile browsers
> support deflated content? Those browsers are going to be the ones
> most affected by the uncompressed files.
>
> I have to assume that the iP(hone/od) Touch does with Safari
On Jan 16, 9:47 pm, odelya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The last version 1.6 prototype.js file is around 150kb!! that's alot
> for a web site.
>
> I only need to use the functuallity for rating articles in my website.
>
> Do you have a smaller version of the file?
What functions do you
But this begs me to ask...do (specifically, which) mobile browsers support
deflated content? Those browsers are going to be the ones most affected by
the uncompressed files.
I have to assume that the iP(hone/od) Touch does with Safari in it, but what
about the Nokia internet tablets? or regular
Use apache's deflate module to serve up javascripts and html/css and
it will bring the size back down even further. All major browsers
support receiving deflated pages (and apache will send uncompressed
ones to incapable browsers)
On 16 Jan 2008, at 13:21, Mark Brown wrote:
> I've used jsm
Hi,
I've used jsmin(http://javascript.crockford.com/jsmin.html) to shrink the
filesize of Prototype 1.6 down to around 80kb,
but I too thought a smaller version free of formatting and comments should
be offered on the website also.
On Jan 16, 2008 10:47 PM, odelya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
