OMG! Thank you.
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:54:19 PM UTC-7, Carlos Figueiredo wrote:
>
> Try rename your file to bla_spec.rb
>
> Atenciosamente,
>
> *Carlos Figueiredo*
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Peter >wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Could anyone tell me why my spec/features ar
Hi, I hope the attached code explain all to you.
Regards,
Eduardo Figarola.
Attachments:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/8819/attrdcl.rb
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
T
Try rename your file to bla_spec.rb
Atenciosamente,
*Carlos Figueiredo*
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Could anyone tell me why my spec/features are not being read?
>
> Ruby 2.0
> Rails 4.0
> Rspec 2.14.0
> capybara 2.1.0
>
> It is a fresh 'rails new some
Hello Everyone,
Could anyone tell me why my spec/features are not being read?
Ruby 2.0
Rails 4.0
Rspec 2.14.0
capybara 2.1.0
It is a fresh 'rails new some_app'. I created a spec/features directory and
added a bla.rb with bad syntax to cause it to fail, when I run rspec it
says 0 examples and 0
Peter wrote in post #1124413:
> By "wrap together", I meant I would write a single function for all the
> functions I would use from the AWS API.
>
> So, I should put this in the models directory, right? I want the
> controller
> to remain a "controller" with respect to rails-isms.
>
> class MyAWSA
By "wrap together", I meant I would write a single function for all the
functions I would use from the AWS API.
So, I should put this in the models directory, right? I want the controller
to remain a "controller" with respect to rails-isms.
class MyAWSAPI
def list_servers
... call to AWS
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Peter wrote:
> What if you don't want your model to be tied to a database therefore not
> ActiveRecord, where do you put that model instead?
In models, because nobody said models had to be ActiveRecord because
models define behaviors but if you want the Railism th
Hello Everyone,
What if you don't want your model to be tied to a database therefore not
ActiveRecord, where do you put that model instead?
I want to write a class that would wrap together the various functions
from, let's say, the AWS API. Would I write that class and place it in the
models d
Jason Hsu, Rubyist wrote in post #1124349:
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 7:21:57 PM UTC-5, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote:
>
>>
>> That's really up to you AFAIK. I typically use the MIT license on my
>> stuff, but choosing a license can be a fairly personal choice. It
>> depends on what you're trying to
I use the MIT license as well. It's common enough that users will
recognise it immediately, and covers the basics while being succinct.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubs
Thanks Jordon, that's giving me a few things to go on. (Off to
investigate...)
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 4:15:18 PM UTC+1, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Phillip >
> wrote:
> > I am trying to deploy my first rails app in a production environment,
> but
> > cann
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Phillip wrote:
> I am trying to deploy my first rails app in a production environment, but
> cannot get the assets to load. The site is hosted on Webfaction, they advise
> to create a "static app" to serve the assets which I have done. But I don't
> understand how
Hello,
(Rails 4, Ruby 2)
I am trying to deploy my first rails app in a production environment, but
cannot get the assets to load. The site is hosted on Webfaction, they
advise to create a "static app" to serve the assets which I have done. But
I don't understand how my rails app then knows abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
