Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread fugee ohu
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 11:46:24 AM UTC-5, Walter Lee Davis wrote: > > You (effectively) delete the intermediate object. You could try one of two > things: > > @person.pictures -= [@picture] > > If all the items are persisted, then that should delete the join object > immediately. (Jus

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread fugee ohu
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 11:46:24 AM UTC-5, Walter Lee Davis wrote: > > You (effectively) delete the intermediate object. You could try one of two > things: > > @person.pictures -= [@picture] > > If all the items are persisted, then that should delete the join object > immediately. (Jus

Re: [Rails] Videoconferencing.

2018-02-07 Thread Germano Teixeira
I didn't know bigbluebutton. Em qua, 7 de fev de 2018 às 05:47, Mauro Sanna escreveu: > Thanks for the answer. What about bigbluebutton? > > On 6 February 2018 at 21:15, Germano Teixeira wrote: > >> I'm using most of the time https://appear.in/, its free for few users . >> >> If you are looking

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread Colin Law
On 7 February 2018 at 17:19, fugee ohu wrote: > > I dunno why this doesn't produce any output > > <% @pictures=Picture.all %> > Model.all has been deprecated since rails 2.3.8. Don't use it. > <% @pictures.all do |picture| %> > this should be using each, not all Colin > <% if @pe

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread fugee ohu
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 12:38:57 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: > > On 7 February 2018 at 17:19, fugee ohu > > wrote: > >> >> I dunno why this doesn't produce any output >> >> <% @pictures=Picture.all %> >> > > Model.all has been deprecated since rails 2.3.8. Don't use it. > > >>

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread Colin Law
On 7 February 2018 at 17:51, fugee ohu wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 12:38:57 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: >> >> On 7 February 2018 at 17:19, fugee ohu wrote: >> >>> >>> I dunno why this doesn't produce any output >>> >>> <% @pictures=Picture.all %> >>> >> >> Model.all has be

Re: [Rails] Videoconferencing.

2018-02-07 Thread Karthikeyan A K
https://hubl.in/ On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Mauro Sanna wrote: > Scuse me for the OT. > Can you suggest a good videoconferencing open source product? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread fugee ohu
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 1:01:02 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: > > On 7 February 2018 at 17:51, fugee ohu > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 12:38:57 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: >>> >>> On 7 February 2018 at 17:19, fugee ohu wrote: >>> I dunno why this doe

Re: [Rails] has_many_through new association for exisitng records

2018-02-07 Thread Walter Lee Davis
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 1:43 PM, fugee ohu wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 1:01:02 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: > On 7 February 2018 at 17:51, fugee ohu wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 12:38:57 PM UTC-5, Colin Law wrote: > On 7 February 2018 at 17:19, fugee ohu w