What's your use-case?
Theoretically you can stick a normal Rails (2.3.x) app under /vendor/
plugins and it will get picked up.
Probably the most important part (in my view) is to namespace your
plugin including the routes. E.g. we have a plugin which handles all
site related stuff like users, secti
You could try: http://rubyforge.org/projects/activedirectory/ looked
at it shortly before but decided against it since I just needed to
authenticated against AD so Net::LDAP was enough for me.
On Nov 17, 3:13 am, Mauro wrote:
> There is a gem or a plugin suitable to browse an active directory?
>
Try skip_filter(*names, &blk) instead.
On Nov 18, 11:32 am, Ant wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having trouble with an app I am upgrading to Rails 3 where the
> skip_before_filter I have in a controller does not work.
>
> Looking at the rails 3 docshttp://api.rubyonrails.org/
>
> I can't find any mention of
Ah forgot, in your case you need rails itself I don't have it on my
servers since packed within the application.
$ sudo gem install rails
On Nov 3, 12:55 am, Daniel Guettler wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> from your previous posts I think you are using Ubuntu here is how I
> recently
Hi Nathan,
from your previous posts I think you are using Ubuntu here is how I
recently setup my stack on Ubuntu 10.04 (you may be on 10.10 since you
actually have a Ruby 1.9.2-p0 package... 10.04 doesn't)
My setup consists of:
- nginx for front-end web server
- mysql for database
- git for sourc
Not sure if it's possible in your architecture, but we are working a
lot with namespaces.
E.g. you could have a Customs::ShipmentParsChecksController and a
Customs::SomeOtherController etc. this would group your controllers,
models and views into related sections.
Your views then would look like:
a
We have done it for couple of years, while transitioning one
application from php to rails, but in a limited way.
Eg we didn't share the rails session with php, but only read session
information one way from php to rails.
Also you will need some way to update the php session so it doesn't
time out
It obviously depends on your needs. We are connecting to multiple
databases simply because we have to pull information from different
systems.
We have a main database where most Rails related data lives but we are
also connecting to a second system which belongs to our PACS image
storage system to
Hi Paul,
I'm running a test server in production environment with nginx as
front-end, ruby-1.9.1-p378 and one mongrel in the backend.
The script I'm currently using to start the application is as
following:
#!/bin/sh
export RAILS_ENV=production
# kill old server if running
if [ -f /home/csb/app
You want to make comment a polymophic association
e.g. on your person and family model you have:
has_many :comments, :as => :attachable
then on the comment class you have:
belongs_to :attachable, :polymorphic => true
and in your table for comments you have:
integer :attachable_id
string :attac
ge bonus when it comes to keeping all my apps
> up to date as I can simply update the version of the gem being used.
>
> On Mar 8, 2:28 pm, Daniel Guettler wrote:
>
>
>
> > What if you simply add the additional plugins to your main
> > application?
> > At l
What if you simply add the additional plugins to your main
application?
At least this is what I'm doing... I have 30+ engine plugins which
partly depend on each other. So we add whatever is required to the
main application. For testing each engine plugin still has to
reference all needed plugins bu
Yes thank you, I read Yehuda's articles before but was not thinking
of :new_record? when I was working with my Session class. So I had to
learn it the hard way.
On Feb 21, 2:07 pm, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Daniel Guettler
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
it may be worth considering changing the logging to actually read:
Started PUT "/login" for 127.0.0.1 IFF the _method parameter is set
to :put
On Feb 21, 5:01 am, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Guettler
> wrote:
>
> > What are you trying to prove
an ActiveRecord model.
On Feb 21, 12:14 am, Daniel Guettler
wrote:
> What are you trying to prove here?
> I'm not using ActiveRecord and my Session class IS NOT inheriting from
> ActiveRecord::Base either
>
> Session.anchestors => [Session, ActiveModel::Validations,
>
method.
On Feb 20, 10:04 pm, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Daniel Guettler <
> > daniel.guett...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Ok but I'm not using an ActiveRecord instance here
rad Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Daniel Guettler <
> > daniel.guett...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yes, this is correct and expected, the question to me is rather if it
> >> is ex
Yes, this is correct and expected, the question to me is rather if it
is expected behavior to assume an update operation if the object
doesn't respond to :new_record?
On Feb 20, 7:34 pm, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Daniel Guettler
> wrote:
>
> > S
reverse merged later with the provided options
this can be avoided by setting explicit :html => { :method => :post }
in form_for - not sure though if this is entended behavior...
If someone has some inside view comments would be appreciated...
On Feb 20, 7:24 pm, Daniel Guettler wrot
PUT
Session.new.new_record? => NoMethodError
Session.new.id => nil
On Feb 20, 7:17 pm, Daniel Guettler wrote:
> ah the last bit of the previous message should have not been in there,
> but should have been in this message.
>
> Changing the Session class to:
>
> class Session
going on here) makes the everything
work correctly with:
form_for(Session.new, :url => login_path)
This clearly shouldn't be related but this is what I have so far...
On Feb 20, 7:11 pm, Daniel Guettler wrote:
> not quite the routes you are providing are not equivalent to what I
>
pm, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Guettler <
> > daniel.guett...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi, I just ran into this ActionController::RoutingError and just
> >> wante
uting error goes away.
Not really sure yet why this...
On Feb 20, 6:02 pm, Daniel Guettler wrote:
> Hi, I just ran into this ActionController::RoutingError and just
> wanted to check if someone can confirm this as a bug in the Rails 3
> beta gem.
>
> config/routes.rb contains
Hi, I just ran into this ActionController::RoutingError and just
wanted to check if someone can confirm this as a bug in the Rails 3
beta gem.
config/routes.rb contains:
get 'login' => 'session#new'
post 'login' => 'session#create', :as => :login
GET /login works fine:
Started
Not sure about a blog or tutorial, but I think this project
http://github.com/hassox/pancake could match what you're looking for.
On Jan 30, 5:52 pm, Kristian wrote:
> I remember having stumbled upon a tutorial or blog, describing how to
> mount multiple web apps in a single rails/rack applicatio
25 matches
Mail list logo
