Hey guys. In Rails 2, is there a way to create a route at run-time? I
want to do this because a gem that I'm writing requires a single
resource route, and I'd prefer that the gem create it at run-time
instead of forcing the user to define the route in routes.rb .
While trying to figure this out,
Hey guys. I'm writing an acts_as_X plugin that's used by
controllers. Unfortunately, the plugin isn't being reloaded for each
request [in the dev env].
I thought that adding
config.reload_plugins = true if RAILS_ENV == 'development'
to environment.rb , as well as
require 'acts_as_X'
to my
G'day folks. In the Rails console, if you configure ActiveRecord's
logger to output to STDOUT, like this:
ActiveRecord::Base.logger = Logger.new STDOUT
how do you switch it back to writing to a file? I tried the 2 lines
below separately, but AR still logs to STDOUT afterwards:
In the code below, p.comments.foobar calls #foobar on every comment.
Is there a way to call #foobar only on the comments that belong to
post p?
class Comment ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :post
def self.foobar; end
end
class Post ActiveRecord::Base
has_many
On Jun 26, 3:51 pm, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/26 Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com:
In the code below, p.comments.foobar calls #foobar on every comment.
Is there a way to call #foobar only on the comments that belong to
post p?
class Comment
On Jun 12, 4:54 am, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2009, Nick Hoffman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Ashwin
Mangaleashwin.mang...@gmail.com wrote:
Try commenting out the uniqueness constraint and check the result.
To be fair, the validations
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Ashwin
Mangaleashwin.mang...@gmail.com wrote:
Try commenting out the uniqueness constraint and check the result. To be
fair, the validations listed are fairly standard and can be done before the
keyword object is created ( client-side using something like ajax
On Jun 11, 11:29 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser rails-mailing-l...@andreas-
s.net wrote:
Nick Hoffman wrote:
[...]
25,000 model instances is a lot, but 5 minutes seems too long. Any
suggestions for how to speed this up?
Thanks,
Nick
Since you're calling k.save each time through the loop
On 2008-12-08, at 21:12, Nick wrote:
Quick question: Would it be better to use this?:
map.resources :maps, :only = [:index]
or this?:
map.connect '/maps',
:controller = :maps,
:action = :index
Cheers,
Nick
BTW, that second option should actually be this:
map.connect '/maps',
On 2008-11-30, at 16:31, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
One good way to think about it is: if you did have an extra check,
what would it do? In other words, if create gets executed and
params[:book] is nil, what would you want to happen?
Hi David. I was thinking about what do in this
On 2008-11-30, at 18:31, Frederick Cheung wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 21:47, Nick Hoffman wrote:
On 2008-11-30, at 16:31, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
One good way to think about it is: if you did have an extra check,
what would it do? In other words, if create gets executed and
params[:book
On 2008-11-24, at 08:37, Joel Oliveira wrote:
Hey Nick!
First - thanks for the reply.
Second - the reason why I'm trying to do this is to allow whatever
type of widget model I'm creating to render its own particular
partial, in the context of the area a user will place it - header,
This is a fairly long question, but it's a common one that applies to
a lot of applications. Here goes!
Many apps have/want a setup similar to this:
1) ModelA has many ModelBs (Eg: User has many Photos).
2) Admins CRUD all photos at /photos and beyond (Eg: /photos/1/edit).
3) Admins CRUD User
I compared the output from ``rake routes'' for each solution below,
and they both produce the exact same routes. Is one solution preferred
over the over?
# Solution #1:
map.resource :account do |account|
account.resources :properties, :controller = 'account/properties'
G'day Justin.
That's a great suggestion. I would actually prefer using a helper
method over putting the call to ModelObject#find in the view itself.
Something about calling find directly from the view just doesn't feel
right to me. The only reason I'm not 100% opposed to it is because a
Adriano Ferreira wrote:
It's been couple of days messing around with Internet looking for a good
Authentication including Autorization system/plugin for Ruby On Rails.
I've found lots of sources related to that. However, most of them are
old,
not frequently updated, not even well
Daniel Lopes wrote:
Hello, anyone know who is the best plug-in for authorization in rails?
I found this link
http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Authorization_in_Rails
but is old, maybe today we have something better.
Thanks.
There's no best. Every situation is different. You need to
Santosh Turamari wrote:
I have an app in which, I have profiles which has friends list.. I want
to apply some privacy settings as to allow, to visit only their friends
in network..How to write the code in controller.. can anybody pls
explain me.. I am new to ror.
That's just implementating
I'm testing an XHR, and until I discovered :chained_replace_html , the
test wasn't seeing that a div was being hidden.
=== map_filter.rjs
22 page['map-filter-errors'].hide
===
Why does line 433 above fail?:
=== neighbourhoods_controller_spec.rb
432 do_xhr @xhr_params
433
19 matches
Mail list logo
