for example, i'm trying to paginate results on this home page
http://wlodb.com
(forum posts, items, compounds, etc...)
I have followed this railscast
http://railscasts.com/episodes/174-pagination-with-ajax to get ajax and
will_paginate working on the pages with only one table...but i'm not
sure
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Apr 25, 1:57�am, Scott Kulik li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
updating the database when a users has problems with their private
messages page.
I'm wondering if someone knows a good way I could scan the the pm's
table
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Apr 25, 1:57�am, Scott Kulik li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
updating the database when a users has problems with their private
messages page.
I'm wondering if someone knows a good way I could scan the the pm's
table and delete messages that no longer have a user
I have a table for private messages similar to:
PMS:
title
body
sent_to (foreign key to users table)
sent_from (foreign key to users table)
When I originally set it up I didn't have it automatically a users pm's
when that user was deleted. So...I have basically been manually
updating the
is there a way i can get a rake task to destroy the dependents declared
in the model when an item is destroyed?
here is my rake task code:
task(:deleteFakes = :environment) do
@items = Item.find(:all, :conditions = 'items.fake = true', :order
= 'name')
@items.each do |item|
Scott Kulik wrote:
is there a way i can get a rake task to destroy the dependents declared
in the model when an item is destroyed?
here is my rake task code:
task(:deleteFakes = :environment) do
@items = Item.find(:all, :conditions = 'items.fake = true', :order
= 'name
i'm a little confused here on what's happening.
i have two tables ITEMS and ITEM_TYPES
ITEMS (belongs_to :item_type)
id
name
item_type_id
ITEM_TYPES
id
name
here is my Item.rb model code for my query:
find(:all,
:select = 'items.name, item_types.name',
:include =
Harold wrote:
The find's :select option is ignored when you combine it with
the :include option.
On Apr 16, 8:58�pm, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
thanks. i removed the include and did my joins manually. i guess
that's probably the best way:
find(:all
ok, here's my dilemna...i have a site that has a list of item
combinations (aka compounds) for a computer game.
i'm having a hard time coming up with a good way to search a compounds
result and the items that are contained within the compound.
the formulas are setup like:
COMPOUND =
Denis Haskin wrote:
And where was it going? ;-)
dwh
i had some cpu intensive code to validate the items on the page and i
screwed up the query so it was running the code on all 7000 rows in the
table instead of just the 50 displayed on current page. doh!
--
Posted via
I have a page that does a lot of calculations...that for some reason
takes 19 seconds to load when running in my development environment.
Looking at my logs I can see Rendering took .8 seconds and the DB took
2.38 seconds:
Completed in 19.81708 (0 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 0.80910 (4%) | DB:
Rob Biedenharn wrote:
You can try New Relic's Rails Performance Monitor [1] to find out some
of those details.
[1] http://newrelic.com/get-RPM.html
-Rob
Rob Biedenharnhttp://agileconsultingllc.com
r...@agileconsultingllc.com
thanks rob! i just installed the plugin and I can see
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Mar 21, 1:44�pm, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
wrote:
Hashes are not ordered in ruby 1.8 - if you want an ordering use an
array (eg [['Yes', 1], ['No',0]]).
For an option to be preselected it's value (the second bit) must be
equal to the last
I'm using getclicky for my site statistics. They have a url I can use
to get the number of users online. I found ways to parse an xml file if
it is local, but how should i do this if is from another link like
I'm currently using eldorado forum which shows the users that are
currently logged on. I wanted to also add the number of guests that are
currently viewing the site.
What do you think is the best way to go about this and where should I
keep track of this number?
I'm thinking I would have to
I just updated one of my javascript libraries and restarted the thin
server but I can see the old javascript file is still being cached
somehow. How can I fix this?
I cleared my local cache as well but it is still pulling up the old
javascript file.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Scott Kulik wrote:
I just updated one of my javascript libraries and restarted the thin
server but I can see the old javascript file is still being cached
somehow. How can I fix this?
I cleared my local cache as well but it is still pulling up the old
javascript file.
got it. i had
I can do sorting by a single field like the following:
@users.sort! { |a,b| a.name.downcase = b.name.downcase }
but what if i want to sort by user.name and then user.rank?
what's the best way to do this?
thanks!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Scott Kulik wrote:
I can do sorting by a single field like the following:
@users.sort! { |a,b| a.name.downcase = b.name.downcase }
but what if i want to sort by user.name and then user.rank?
what's the best way to do this?
thanks!
just got it:
@objects.sort! do |a,b|
comp
I have created the following select box which works fine except for
the
fact if you edit the item it defaults back to N/A instead of selecting
the correct location.
select_tag(item[location_id], 'option value=N/A/option' +
options_for_select(@locations.collect{|location| [location.name,
i have bunch of item properties that need to be stored in the database.
the options for the properties are:
-unknown
-yes
-no
what do you think is the best way to store this data?
should i use a tinyint and only store 0, 1, 2 for the respective options
or just use a varchar(10) and store the
say for example i had something simple like this in a view:
tr class=eventd%= check_box_tag(:task) %/td
how would i add onclick to change the row color on a check and when the
check is removed?
maybe something like this?
page[task].addClassName('complete')
i'm not that familiar with
Mark Reginald James wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
i'm not that familiar with javascript so i'm not sure how i would finish
this. thanks!
%= check_box_tag :task, 1, false,
:onchange = $(parentNode.parentNode).toggleClassName('complete') %
--
Rails Wheels - Find Plugins, List Sell
Scott Kulik wrote:
Mark Reginald James wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
i'm not that familiar with javascript so i'm not sure how i would finish
this. thanks!
%= check_box_tag :task, 1, false,
:onchange = $(parentNode.parentNode).toggleClassName('complete') %
--
Rails Wheels - Find
Brandon Keepers wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Scott Kulik
rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net wrote:
another check box the first check box row gets highlighted.
any idea what could be causing the incompatibility with IE?
Try adding `this`:
%= check_box_tag :task, 1, false
Scott Kulik wrote:
but they all produce the same weird result where they don't update until
i click a second time. first click always does nothing.
finally got it. it was the :onchange that was causing some issues. i
changed it to :onclick and all methods are now working with IE7
Scott Kulik wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
Sazima wrote:
Maybe s.items.count is zero?
Cheers, Sazima
On Dec 19, 5:01�am, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
hmm...it shouldn't be since @user.items.count in my view shows the count
correctly for each user
Sazima wrote:
Maybe s.items.count is zero?
Cheers, Sazima
On Dec 19, 5:01�am, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
hmm...it shouldn't be since @user.items.count in my view shows the count
correctly for each user.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com
Scott Kulik wrote:
Sazima wrote:
Maybe s.items.count is zero?
Cheers, Sazima
On Dec 19, 5:01�am, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
hmm...it shouldn't be since @user.items.count in my view shows the count
correctly for each user.
is there another i can do it like
Scott Kulik wrote:
Scott Kulik wrote:
Sazima wrote:
Maybe s.items.count is zero?
Cheers, Sazima
On Dec 19, 5:01�am, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
hmm...it shouldn't be since @user.items.count in my view shows the count
correctly for each user.
is there another i
Scott Kulik wrote:
cool thanks i'll test it out this week!
i just got it working. i like it because it's so simple but is there
anyway to have the popup show up at the mouse pointer instead of a fixed
location?
i dont know javascript very well offhand.
also, it looks like it's getting
I have two models:
Items
-id
-name
-created_by (links to user id)
...
Users
-id
-name
-items_count
...
item.rb:
belongs_to :user, :class_name = 'User', :foreign_key = 'created_by',
:counter_cache = true
user.rb:
has_many :items, :foreign_key = 'created_by'
bah...i figured it out. i didn't have a default value of 0 set in the
field so it wasn't updating. now it's working!
the only thing now is that i have a couple thousand users who have 0 for
the count values. what do you think is the best way i can mass update
this field?
--
Posted via
Bryce Roney wrote:
You can run a migration like this
def self.up
User.find(:all) do |u|
u.update_attribute :items_count, s.items.count
end
end
That will go through all your users and update the items_count field
for all of them.
~~~
Bryce Roney
[ twitter ][
Bryce Roney wrote:
Oh sorry! I was copying the code out of a project I had.
change s.items.count to u.items.count
-- Bryce Roney
np!
i just tried it with the new code and it says its successful again but
items_count is still showing 0. i checked @user.items.count in one of
my views
Emanuele Tozzato wrote:
I did not try it on god-damn-IE.. =)
you should modify the js part with code from this example
http://www.codelifter.com/main/javascript/capturemouseposition1.html,
the script was originally based on mouse position, but I thought it
was annoying.. :)
hmm...looks
Bryce Roney wrote:
You can run a migration like this
def self.up
User.find(:all) do |u|
u.update_attribute :items_count, s.items.count
end
end
That will go through all your users and update the items_count field
for all of them.
~~~
Bryce Roney
[ twitter ][
I have been using overlib (javascript library) to create popups on
mouseover but it has issues with some browsers.
I just need something simple and was wondering if any had any
suggestions.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Bobnation wrote:
I would see if there are ways for you to implement caching ... but it
also seems like there is maybe a memory leak within your code causing
some problems. I'm not expert, but those are my thoughts.
On Dec 9, 9:43�am, Scott Kulik rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
thanks
i guess nobody has as many problems as me. in general, do thin server
processes normally keep growing and growing or do they cap out in size?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
When I initially start up my server I have two thin processes running
that are only about 200M in size. They slowly creep up a few megs an
hour until now a week later they are at 400M and 300M respectively.
I realize that my site (http://wlodb.com) has some intensive pages that
take a couple
i want to add a little side box next to the posts where users can click
smiley icons to insert them into the post.
i'm guessing that i'm probably going to use ajax/javascript but was
wondering if there are some easier ways to do this with some built in
rails functionality...or if there are
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Nov 10, 12:58�am, Scott Kulik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote:
thanks for the info fred.
i was just thinking that I should probably do the checking to see if an
item is locked in the model before updating. �so in item.rb:
Personally I would
Elias Orozco wrote:
Hi Scott,
Try :put instead of :post on the :member param, like this:
map.resources :compounds, :collection = { :calculator
= :get }, :member = { :confirm = :put }
Elias,
i tried put but got this error back:
Only put requests are allowed.
robert,
i think the
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On 9 Nov 2008, at 20:19, Scott Kulik wrote:
end
Well you can't pass an argument to a filter like that. you'd have to
fetch the item first (I presume this is all boilerplate stuff so
you're interested in the one of id params[:id].
Also, returning false from
I have a list of items in which some are locked. if they are locked
then I want to make them not be able to be edited.
how can i set up something like this:
before_filter :locked?(item), :only = [:edit, :update]
def locked?(item)
if item.locked then return false
end
or how should i
here is some of the code:
@items_all = Item.find(:all)
for item in @items_all do
if not FileTest.exist?(item.image_name)
@items_missing_images += item
end
end
You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
You might have expected an instance of Array.
The
thanks for both replies! that's exactly what i was looking for.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send
I'm trying to setup some fragment caching which works fine for the index
but i'm not sure how to ignore the caching if they are searching the
index results.
my code in short:
ItemsController
def index
@items = Item.search(params[:search], params[:min_rank],
params[:max_rank],
49 matches
Mail list logo
