Yves Senn*
* Accept symbols as `#send_data` :disposition value. [Backport
#8329] *Elia Schito*
* Add i18n scope to `distance_of_time_in_words`. [Backport #7997]
*Steve Klabnik*
* Fix side effect of `url_for` changing the `:controller` string
option. [Backport #6003]
Before:
c
Paperclip is really good stuff.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegrou
You'd have been fine with 2.3.5 if you'd have rack 1.0.1 installed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rub
considering it's user.invitation_limit, (or maybe @user), that means you
need to define one or the other.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscri
Your application.html.erb?
Then yeah, you're going to need @user defined in every controller.
Also, is this a user that was created before you added in your invitations?
If so, you won't have anything for an invitation_limit for any of your
users, you'll want to do a User.all.each{|user| user.inv
I don't see you defining @user anywhere. Which view is your code in?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ru
I don't think that Rails 3 is using anything that wouldn't already be
supported by older browsers. It's not like it's sticking in by
default, just using some special named parameters. A large goal with HTML5
was backward compatibility.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
The Rails Way certainly is the de facto Rails book... but for Rails 1.2. I'm
pretty sure it was never updated for 2.x, but I could be wrong. My copy is
for 1.2.
In any case, yeah, as everyone else said, it should work. The "rake routes"
suggestion is a good one, since you're seeing a routing error
You probably want to use after_create in your user model:
http://www.therailsway.com/2006/12/8/idiomatic-ruby
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To uns
It's a default value.
In languages that don't have default values, you _always_ have to pass in an
argument. For example, if you defined it this way (or if Ruby didn't support
them...)
def render_show_actions(resource, actions, options)
When you called the function, you'd have to do this
rende
Try running 'script/destroy scaffold Title:string' and seeing if that takes
care of it for you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from th
Yes, cucumber and rspec are both used for BDD.
I personally prefer Cucumber, but some people find it offputting, and prefer
their tests to be less english, more code. Both are great tools, though.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:04 AM, pepe wrote:
> I want to start diving into BDD. I have never used T
You may also want to look into Unicorn, which can give you no-downtime
deploys.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
I use both Heroku and Rackspace with my hosting. I've heard great things
about Slicehost and Linode as well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubs
Continuing to play around with it, apparently the javascript tags aren't
included in the scaffolding. When I include them all, the confirmation
dialog comes up, but still makes a GET request.
Maybe that just hasn't been implemented yet. Hm.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Steve Kla
Has anyone been playing around with the Rails 3 code? I'm having an issue
with destroying models.
I started an app using Yehuda's "Spinning up a new Rails app" example.
Worked great. "script/generate scaffold Post title:string body:text"
Awesome. "rake db:migrate". Great. Everything works... except
You might want to check out Railscast #24.
http://railscasts.com/episodes/124-beta-invitations
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:34 PM, dino d. wrote:
> hi -
>
> i want to do some testing with live users, as many people have done
> before me. has someone encapsulated this in a simple plugin that
> req
A "welcome" controller probably shouldn't be part of your admin interface...
usually that name is used for the site landing page. Or am I
misunderstanding the purpose of your page? Is it the main screen of your
admin section?
A "login" controller depends on how you're making your user accounts. I'
When you write that onclick, don't you have to also make it submit the
form? Try this:
<%= submit_tag 'Save', :class => 'submit', :onclick =>
"document.getElementById('save_button').disabled=true;document.forms["myform"].submit();",
:id =>
"save_button" %>
changing the id, obviously.
--
You rece
Seriously consider fixing your problem and upgrading to 2.3.5, though. There
was a big vulnerability fixed in that release:
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2009/11/30/ruby-on-rails-2-3-5-released
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:48 PM, RubyonRails_newbie <
craigwest...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Problem sol
You seem to be pretty close. Have you used a tool like Firebug to inspect
the value of the hidden field?
You're probably looking for this:
<%= f.hidden_field :patient_id, :value => @patient_id %>
with @patient_id being set to whatever value you'd like it to be updated to.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 a
Let me get this straight. You have users. Users have Stuff. You want a page,
say, where a given user can see just their Stuff, and nobody else's?
Well, you'd want to make your User have_many :stuffs, and your Stuffs
belong_to :user . This'll require a user_id column in your Stuffs table.
Then, fi
There's also Unicorn.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
F
There's a new book that's currently a work in progress, but the first few
chapters are excellent! You can read it online here:
http://railstutorial.org
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Manish Belsare wrote:
> Hey m doin a project on web application..I need 2 know how to start with
> the coding u
Because the cloud is your cluster of servers. You don't deal with that
problem, they do.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this gro
Well, the purpose of Helpers is to keep your views nice and DRY, so you
could make some helpers with common code that comes up because of this, that
takes a user.
Your helpers still end up looking like this, though, so it's not super
ideal, but you've at least pushed the ugly down as far as possib
I personally use paperclip, and not attachment-fu, but I also usually end up
making an Asset model that is polymorphically associated with my other
models. That way, I can keep all of my file handling stuff in one place, as
well as keeping the number of attachments flexible.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at
You would want each_with_index.
<% @recipie.steps.each do |step, index| %>
<%= index %>: <%= step.step %>
<% end %>
A little cleaner, and handles updating the index for you.
-Steve
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Ooh_Gravy wrote:
> So answering my own question, is this ok or i
28 matches
Mail list logo
