Oh... and as far as the old-school markup goes... I was just using the
code for the example I was working off of just to see if I could
make things work. The partial will be completely different when I'm
done with it.
On Aug 6, 10:01 am, Trish wrote:
> Thank you so much. I just
Thank you so much. I just realized that myself. I can't believe I
missed that simple mistake. I was so busy looking for something
major, I overlooked a simple bug.
How embarrassing.
Thanks for your help,
Trish
On Aug 6, 9:06 am, Hassan Schroeder
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at
script coming across is shown to be this:
$("#2").after("")
I'm going crazy trying to do something that seems so simple, but the
unexpected keeps getting in my way.
On Aug 6, 6:52 am, Trish wrote:
> Thank you for your replies. I verified that jQ is loaded in my
> h
ith line breaks... javascript could not interpret it
properly since it was seeing multiple lines instead of a string like:
"\n\n\n\n". It was returning it as:
"
"
But I'm not totally sure... if that was the issue.
Thanks again for all of your help,
Trish
On Aug 6, 2:12 am, An
plenty of formatting to do, but I hope this was my last
major hurdle. If you do have any more input on this issue (or
thoughts on why I ran into my problems), please let me know. I would
love to figure out what was going on,.
Thanks for your help,
Trish
On Aug 5, 11:34 pm, Trish wrote:
> It&#x
t, I get a javascript error saying "r is null". I
believe it is failing on one of my tags.
I appreciate any guidance you can give me on this. I have been trying
to solve this sorting issue for days, now, with various methods... and
just when I feel like I'm close, I run into a w
00 code
for $.post.
Also, I have tried this with both jQuery 1.4 and the jQuery instance
provided with the plugin.
Thanks in advance!
Trish
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rub
Thank you for your help. As you suggested, I decided to handle the
sort on the front end with a jQuery plugin. That resolves my issues
with this, and no longer need to worry about creating a complex Active
Record call.
Thanks for your help!
Trish
On Aug 3, 8:59 pm, Angel Robert Marquez
wrote
See below...
Thanks!
Trish
On Aug 3, 11:00 am, Angel Robert Marquez
wrote:
> > Thank you for your response. However, I am refactoring an existing
> > application, and am trying to remove a bunch of pure SQL that was put
> > in the code. I believe the best way to do th
JOIN stores on stores.id = products.store_id OR stores.id =
departments.store_id
However, I am also using an :include option for several associations,
and it seems that joins and include are mutually exclusive. I'd
really had to have to write out all of the associations.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
T
ugh an association instead of just through a
function because I want to gain the dynamic methods created by
has_many, specifically the "collection.find(...)" method so I can add
more conditions to the collection.
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks in advance!
Trish
--
You received thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
