Colin Law wrote in post #1160521: > Do you realise that that statement means that under no circumstances > will it be more that 4x times faster, may never be 4x faster and may > be much slower? It is like saying up to 50% off in a sale. If you > are lucky you may find something that much off but most items will > reduced by much less. > > Some meaningful statistics would be more worthwhile.
4x faster than Unicorn is the best case that we have found. Of course it also depends on the application, but this 4x faster best case is *possible*. If we have not observed this best case then we would not advertise with "up to 4x". We have also gone into great lengths to ensure that performance will, in the worst case, be similar to Unicorn/Puma. But you don't have to take our word for it. Fabio Akita - a prominent Brazilliant Ruby blogger - has reviewed Raptor: http://www.akitaonrails.com/2014/10/19/the-new-kid-on-the-block-for-ruby-servers-raptor. I quote: "This could mean that at the best case scenario, you could get almost 4 times the throughput from your application, and in the worst case scenario, you're still getting similar throughputs." -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/79a8a95a8c7cd3c47b990de863460940%40ruby-forum.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
