hi all,
i just got back from railsconf and forgot to ask a question. what is
the current status of handling concurrent requests? i am migrating to
rails2.3/ruby1.9 on thin and am confused about how many thins i need
and whether i can serve up multiple concurrent requests to them. in
front i use n
also, my particular case is with asp content; but i am sure that the
problem can be reproduced with any web stack or even a static text
file with these characters.
On Apr 13, 6:52 pm, buddycat wrote:
> so i use lib/asp.rb module to get legacy asp content from internal
> win2k/iis5/asp (c
well but now need to do so
with the former. imho.
thanks...gg
On Apr 13, 5:05 am, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> 2009/4/13 buddycat
>
>
>
>
>
> > hector,
>
> > further update:
>
> > i was able to set both my internal and external encoding thanks to
> > hong
at i started with.
so...guess i am back to doing explicit encoding like you suggested or
going back to iconv.
all in all i have to say that ruby1.9 and rails2.3 and encoding and
irb and compiling your own ruby and... are still very rough.
...gg
On Apr 13, 12:40 am, buddycat wrote:
> ok. found
bothering to see what version of ruby you are running.
this fixes my immediate problem so thanks. am going to grep
RUBY_PLATFORM to see if that can just be set somewhere in rails as
that seems to be referenced before searching for system location of
irb.
...gg
On Apr 12, 8:27 pm, buddycat wrote
ternal_encoding in a transparent way.
> I recommend you read this blog:
>
> http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/ruby_19s_three_default_encod...
>
> Rails doesn't remove the Encoding class is available in the console.
> I think your console for some reason is using ruby 1.8.
>
> O
ternal_encoding in a transparent way.
> I recommend you read this blog:
>
> http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/ruby_19s_three_default_encod...
>
> Rails doesn't remove the Encoding class is available in the console.
> I think your console for some reason is using ruby 1.8.
>
> O
hi all,
platform: debian lenny, ruby1.91.p0, passenger/apache-multithread,
rails2.3 in vendor/postres and sql server via odbc. all current gems.
i have legacy asp content on win2k servers that i wrap in rails
controllers. this all worked great with ruby1.8, but now that we are
dealing with encod
coding methods exposed as they do in irb?
On Apr 10, 6:24 pm, buddycat wrote:
> thanks conrad,
>
> debian lenny
> apache2-mpm-worker
> dbd-odbc (0.2.4)
> dbi (0.4.1)
> deprecated (2.0.1)
> fastthread (1.0.7)
> json (1.1.4)
> passenger (2.1.3)
> pg (0.8.0)
ncoding
# rescue
#raise "#{self.class} #{self.encoding.name} #{self.valid_encoding?} #
{self}"
#
end
end
class Numeric #:nodoc:
def blank?
false
end
end
On Apr 10, 6:04 pm, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM, buddycat wrote:
>
> > as an upda
On Apr 10, 5:00 pm, buddycat wrote:
> hi all,
>
> anyone seen this controller argument error:
>
> invalid byte sequence in utf-8
>
> ror/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/blank.rb:
> 50:in `=~'
> ror/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_su
hi all,
anyone seen this controller argument error:
invalid byte sequence in utf-8
ror/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/blank.rb:
50:in `=~'
ror/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/blank.rb:
50:in `!~'
ror/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/co
hi all,
i am wondering if there is consensus around whether it is an
assumption of the rails core that each request will be served by a
new, clean thread? i ask because i am using Thread.current hash and
while mongrel seems to handle each request with a new thread and so
Thread.current is clean,
13 matches
Mail list logo
