Re: [Rails] Rails' inflections are messy

On Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:53:43 AM UTC-5, paulie wrote: > > I personally don't like them at all. I wish that all the names of > controllers/routes/models were unchanged so I wouldn't have to keep > deciding whether I needed to pluralize. I remember spending too much > time trying to straighte

Re: [Rails] Rails' inflections are messy

I disagree with this; I think the inflections are important. They're just messy right now. I don't think it's an arduous task to fix them, and I don't think it's unreasonable to take the stance of "Rails can't possibly include every inflection by default." My problem with the current inflection

Re: [Rails] Rails' inflections are messy

I personally don't like them at all. I wish that all the names of controllers/routes/models were unchanged so I wouldn't have to keep deciding whether I needed to pluralize. I remember spending too much time trying to straighten out a scaffold I created named "series". It created a model named "Ser

[Rails] Rails' inflections are messy

Yesterday, I opened a GitHub Issue about moving Rails inflections to an initializer. The idea wasn't received well, understandably, as generating a large initializer with new Rails apps is pretty unappealing. However, the core members seemed open to the