Re: [Rails] Rails 3.1 requires linecache1.9 which requires ruby 1.9?

2011-11-16 Thread Jim Ruther Nill
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:47 PM, KevinC wrote: > I am attempting to install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.87 (because Ruby 1.93 > broke all of my Rails 2 projects). But, the Rails 3.1 gem is > complaining that it needs Ruby 1.9.2 to install linecache19. So, does > this mean that Rails 3.1 needs Ruby 1.

[Rails] Rails 3.1 requires linecache1.9 which requires ruby 1.9?

2011-11-16 Thread KevinC
I am attempting to install Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.87 (because Ruby 1.93 broke all of my Rails 2 projects). But, the Rails 3.1 gem is complaining that it needs Ruby 1.9.2 to install linecache19. So, does this mean that Rails 3.1 needs Ruby 1.92, or can Rails 3.1 be installed with Ruby 1.8.7? Thank