[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-04-01 Thread Frederick Cheung
> > > On Mar 31, 3:13 am, Fernando Perez > > Hi, > I removed comment of the > config.frameworks -=[ :active_record, :active_resource, :action_mailer > ]. > I removed the database.yml and tried to start the server. I am getting > an error > "uninitialized constant Rails::Plugin::ActiveRecord (Name

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Tushar Gandhi
Sijo Kg wrote: > uncomment like (if you dont need active record) No need to remove > database.yml > config.frameworks -= [ :active_record ] > > Now restart the server Still I am getting same error. Thanks Tushar -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~-~--~~-

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Sijo Kg
uncomment like (if you dont need active record) No need to remove database.yml config.frameworks -= [ :active_record ] Now restart the server -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscri

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Tushar Gandhi
Jason Arora wrote: > It is possible to use Rails without a database. This is what Fernando > is referring to: > > # Skip frameworks you're not going to use. To use Rails without a > database > # you must remove the Active Record framework. > # config.frameworks -= > [ :active_record, :activ

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Jason Arora
It is possible to use Rails without a database. This is what Fernando is referring to: # Skip frameworks you're not going to use. To use Rails without a database # you must remove the Active Record framework. # config.frameworks -= [ :active_record, :active_resource, :action_mailer ] On Ma

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Fernando Perez
> I agreed that there is no harm to create an empty database. Is there no > other way? That's lame to install the DB software, configure it, and leave it empty. Read environment.rb and tell your app to not load ActiveRecord. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~-~--~

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Tushar Gandhi
Shuaib Zahda wrote: > As far as I concern that rails runs with database.yml > > u can use sqlite3 and create an empty database which has no harm on > your application > > > > On Mar 31, 11:31�am, Tushar Gandhi I agreed that there is no harm to create an empty database. Is there no other wa

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Fernando Perez
> What should I do for this? Read environment.rb -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonra

[Rails] Re: Application without database.yml

2009-03-31 Thread Shuaib85
As far as I concern that rails runs with database.yml u can use sqlite3 and create an empty database which has no harm on your application On Mar 31, 11:31 am, Tushar Gandhi wrote: > Hi, > > I have created one application. In that application I am not using any > database. > Whenever I starti