Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Aug 12, 4:37�pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser rails-mailing-l...@andreas-
s.net wrote:
are methods in Ruby. �Not all methods are operators, but that's another
syntactic issue.
If we're being pedantic, then not all operators are methods: ! is
Robert Walker wrote:
[...]
Is there really a valid distinction between operators and methods
anymore?
Not for all operators in Ruby. In some languages, not for *any*
operator
Isn't the syntax essentially syntactic sugar allowing for
simplified use of some of the methods?
Yup. And if
On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Robert Walker wrote:
[...]
Is there really a valid distinction between operators and methods
anymore?
Not for all operators in Ruby. In some languages, not for *any*
operator
Isn't the syntax essentially syntactic sugar allowing
Sijo Kg wrote:
Hi brianp
The operator has many different uses: A googling gave
Just a small clarification: is not an operator, it is a method. It
has whatever meaning that is defined by its class.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Robert Walker
rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net wrote:
Sijo Kg wrote:
Hi brianp
The operator has many different uses: A googling gave
Just a small clarification: is not an operator, it is a method. It
has whatever meaning that is defined by its
Robert Walker wrote:
Sijo Kg wrote:
Hi brianp
The operator has many different uses: A googling gave
Just a small clarification: is not an operator, it is a method. It
has whatever meaning that is defined by its class.
is most certainly an operator. It is also a method; all
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Aug 12, 4:37�pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser rails-mailing-l...@andreas-
s.net wrote:
are methods in Ruby. �Not all methods are operators, but that's another
syntactic issue.
If we're being pedantic, then not all operators are methods: ! is not
a method, nor is ?: and
Thanks for the clarification everyone!
I wouldn't have expected it to have different meaning depending on he
object/class type. I'll keep an eye out for that.
On Aug 12, 9:40 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser rails-mailing-l...@andreas-
s.net wrote:
Frederick Cheung wrote:
On Aug 12, 4:37 pm, Marnen
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:49 AM, brianp brian.o.pea...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification everyone!
I wouldn't have expected it to have different meaning depending on he
object/class type. I'll keep an eye out for that.
On Aug 12, 9:40 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, brianp brian.o.pea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I'm just going through Agile Web Development With Rails and we're
using what I'm assuming is an assignment operator.
ex:
@items current_item
In the above context, means to append 'current_item' to the end of
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 14:23 -0700, brianp wrote:
Hey,
I'm just going through Agile Web Development With Rails and we're
using what I'm assuming is an assignment operator.
ex:
@items current_item
But (unless i skipped it) they didn't really explain what that was. So
what is it
On Aug 11, 2:38 pm, Conrad Taylor conra...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I would recommend getting a copy of the 'Programming Ruby' and/or
'Programming Ruby 1.9'.
-Conrad
thanks for the help/recommendation. In the passed 2 week I went
through Simply Rails 2, now AWDWR, next up is Why's (Poignant)
is not only for collection class . even it also works for string
suppose veriable1 = abc
veriable1 def
then if you print the value of veriable1 you will get abcdef
On Aug 12, 5:21 am, brianp brian.o.pea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2:38 pm, Conrad Taylor conra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi brianp
The operator has many different uses: A googling gave
In an Array it is used to append (push) an object into a given array
In a Fixnum and a Bignum object it shifts the number bits to the
left
In an IO object it will write the object (as a string) to the IO
object.
In a
14 matches
Mail list logo
