On Nov 26, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Peter wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Rob!
> The intention was to avoid the the explicit definition of a join table
> in the fixtures,
> like it is possible since some months. See 'Let‘s make the HABTM
> fixture go away. ' in
> http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Fixture
Thanks for the answer Rob!
The intention was to avoid the the explicit definition of a join table
in the fixtures,
like it is possible since some months. See 'Let‘s make the HABTM
fixture go away. ' in
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Fixtures.html
For your approach: I will put the omap into a
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> Hmmh,
>
> even after cleaning up the roles_users (without timestamp) it does not
> work (Hint from [1])
> Tried out different order of fixture importing -> nothing helps.
>
> So, I switched to the old way to define fixtures [2] and it works :-)
>
> R
Hmmh,
even after cleaning up the roles_users (without timestamp) it does not
work (Hint from [1])
Tried out different order of fixture importing -> nothing helps.
So, I switched to the old way to define fixtures [2] and it works :-)
Regards,
Peter.
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrail
4 matches
Mail list logo