[Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-06 Thread Matt Jones
On Feb 6, 12:02 am, Srimanta Chakraborty wrote: > Hi, >     I am a new guy in ruby on rails. I am using this forum to get help > to learn this. So please don't think that I am a loser or chancer. In > this world everybody tries to get chance. If you don't want to help then > just ignore it. > A

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Dave Aronson
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:00, Scott Eisenberg wrote: > Certainly 'nuff said on this "chancer" (whatever that is :-)) for now. Heh. I had to go look it up too. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chancer says: ===8<---cut here--- British : a scheming opportunist Examples of CHANCER

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Scott Eisenberg
I agree that insults in general are bad. This rare time it seemed deserved. A few questions are fine. Being a chump for someone who won't do their homework is beyond the pale. Programmers don't always have good local resources for help. As a student, he should have a professor, TA, fellow s

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Scott Eisenberg
No sir. Not you! Apologies if I gave you that impression. On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:15 AM, Greg Akins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Scott Eisenberg wrote: >> I don't l know why you waste your time -or the group's time - on this guy. >> >> Trying not to say this loser. Oops, just did.

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Greg Akins
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Michael Pavling wrote: > > Not if you read it thus: >  "I don't l know why you waste your time on this loser." > OK, I'll read it that way ;-) Incidentally, even though I was shocked by Srimanta's request, I did learn something from Prince's response. -- Greg Ak

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Pavling
On 3 February 2012 13:15, Greg Akins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Scott Eisenberg wrote: >> I don't l know why you waste your time -or the group's time - on this guy. >> >> Trying not to say this loser.  Oops, just did. > > Scott.  Are you calling me a loser? Not if you read it thus:

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Greg Akins
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Scott Eisenberg wrote: > I don't l know why you waste your time -or the group's time - on this guy. > > Trying not to say this loser.  Oops, just did. > Scott. Are you calling me a loser for posting the comments about Srimanta? -- Greg Akins http://twitter.com/a

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Scott Eisenberg
I don't l know why you waste your time -or the group's time - on this guy. Trying not to say this loser. Oops, just did. On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Greg Akins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Michael Pavling wrote: >> On 3 February 2012 11:23, Srimanta Chakraborty wrote: >>> Micha

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Greg Akins
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Michael Pavling wrote: > On 3 February 2012 11:23, Srimanta Chakraborty wrote: >> Michael Pavling wrote in post #1043878: >>> Really? you're just pasting your homework questions directly to the >>> list now without even paraphrasing them?! >> >> Yes > > Hahaha! At

Re: [Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Pavling
On 3 February 2012 11:23, Srimanta Chakraborty wrote: > Michael Pavling wrote in post #1043878: >> Really? you're just pasting your homework questions directly to the >> list now without even paraphrasing them?! > > Yes Hahaha! At least you're honest :-) -- You received this message because you

[Rails] Re: Clean Up the code

2012-02-03 Thread Srimanta Chakraborty
Michael Pavling wrote in post #1043878: > On 3 February 2012 10:24, Srimanta Chakraborty > wrote: >> 1. Provide the models required >> 2. Each article can be related to many articles (or none).Provide code >> for making @article.related_articles work >> 3. Clean up the code according to rails conv