[Rails] Re: Comparisons between mod_ruby and FastCGI

2008-11-28 Thread Matt
False. My webhost currently has us using FastCGI to run our Rails scripts. I may shoot them an email asking about mod_rails though. On Nov 28, 3:43 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't think anyone uses either of those these days. It's either   > mod_rails or mongrel > > Sent f

[Rails] Re: Comparisons between mod_ruby and FastCGI

2008-11-28 Thread Freddy Andersen
Or my new favorite JRuby with Glassfish... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[Rails] Re: Comparisons between mod_ruby and FastCGI

2008-11-28 Thread Bobnation
You are really going to want to take a look at mongrel, thin, or ... my perference ... Passenger/mod_rails. Just type http://modrails.com into your browser window and be amazed. ;) On Nov 28, 11:53 am, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm a new Ruby on Rails developer who is worki

[Rails] Re: Comparisons between mod_ruby and FastCGI

2008-11-28 Thread blasterpal
I will say stay away from FastCGI, that's all. H On Nov 28, 3:43 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't think anyone uses either of those these days. It's either   > mod_rails or mongrel > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:53, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

[Rails] Re: Comparisons between mod_ruby and FastCGI

2008-11-28 Thread Frederick Cheung
Don't think anyone uses either of those these days. It's either mod_rails or mongrel Sent from my iPhone On 28 Nov 2008, at 17:53, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm a new Ruby on Rails developer who is working on applications for > several different clients using the Ruby