I'm not sure how tied you are to rails 2.3.5 and ruby 1.8, but possibly use
this as an opportunity to upgrade to the current standard tech? Ruby 1.9.2
is pretty much rock solid, and rails 3.0.3 is running very very well now.
As for local development time, what kind of system are you running this
On Jan 25, 3:58 am, Rob Biedenharn
wrote:
> Well, for one thing, the shell loads and executes curl for you.
OK, 20ms accounted for. :-)
I suspect rails reloads all my gems or something like that, as
fs_usage shows a bunch of activity on those files. Is there any way to
make rails cache everyt
On Jan 25, 2011, at 12:10 AM, ChristianP wrote:
That's right, but what happens between 320ms and 831ms?
Well, for one thing, the shell loads and executes curl for you.
-Rob
On Jan 24, 8:19 pm, Ivan Nastyukhin wrote:
in development 320 ms is not slow, because rails reload your class
- s
That's right, but what happens between 320ms and 831ms?
On Jan 24, 8:19 pm, Ivan Nastyukhin wrote:
> in development 320 ms is not slow, because rails reload your class -
> structure.
> What a problem?
>
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 6:13 AM, ChristianP wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi guys,
>
> > Recently, m
4 matches
Mail list logo
