[Rails] Re: Do you agree that as some point, every (big enough) Rails app sould not rely only on ActiveRecord?

Hello, I highly reccomend you DataMapper http://datamapper.org because its code is beautiful, have a helpful community http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper you can immediately change Rails' ORM with this adapter https://github.com/datamapper/dm-rails Also you may give a try for NoSQL: MongoD

[Rails] Re: Do you agree that as some point, every (big enough) Rails app sould not rely only on ActiveRecord?

Thank you all for your answers. Tricon your link seems interresting, I'll read it tomorrow, thanks ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe

[Rails] Re: Do you agree that as some point, every (big enough) Rails app sould not rely only on ActiveRecord?

Always use the best tool for the job. The evolution and scaling of Twitter is a good example of this: http://highscalability.com/scaling-twitter-making-twitter-1-percent-faster -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To pos

[Rails] Re: Do you agree that as some point, every (big enough) Rails app sould not rely only on ActiveRecord?

On Feb 24, 5:09 am, Michel Pigassou wrote: > It's not that I don't agree, I just don't have an opinion on this matter and > asking for thoughts :) > Why Rails with a SQL db would not be enough to *always* scale an app? The quotation does not claim that. What it says is that the ActiveRecord OR