[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2011-02-15 Thread kwiest
Lorenzo, this was actually the first Rails app I ever built. I was just going in to do a bit of cleaning and didn't have time for a full upgrade to Rails 3, but wanted to make sure I had all of the current security fixes. All of my current projects are Rails 3 and Ruby 1.9 Paul, after the first

[Rails] Re: Memory leak in update from 2.1.2 to 2.2.2

2009-01-21 Thread avenger
We had similar problem after upgrading from 2.1.0 to 2.2.2. Rails just kept accumulating memory. After we applied the buffered logger fix (http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/ 9f69ff12d44c4d1e475fd6efede120ccedba3b3e) we were back normal memory usage, no leaks.

[Rails] Re: Memory leak in update from 2.1.2 to 2.2.2

2009-01-12 Thread Frederick Cheung
On 12 Jan 2009, at 10:42, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: My last deployment was based on Rails 2.1.2 and would run for months without restarts and without leaking memory; memory would sit at around 35 to 40M per Mongrel instance. On updating to 2.2.2 I'm seeing gradual memory bloat and every few

[Rails] Re: Memory leak in update from 2.1.2 to 2.2.2

2009-01-12 Thread Wincent Colaiuta
On 12 ene, 11:55, Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote: I know of two memory leaks in 2.2.2: http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/9f69ff12d44c4d1e475fd6efede120cc...http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ede4ce188d29aef94af78f27d89169a... Thanks a lot, Fred. I'll try applying

[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2008-10-16 Thread Andrej Gabara
We're running mongrels on Ubuntu with Ruby 1.8.6-p114, and memory of each process is slowly increasing, so we have to restart them every couple of days or so. Anybody else having to do this? I tried to use bleak-house, but that refused to work without sigsegv'ing. So I've written a simple

[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2008-10-14 Thread Frederick Cheung
On 14 Oct 2008, at 03:07, Alex Gregianin wrote: Does patchlevel 111 have the same problem as well? I've been running ruby 1.8.6 patchlevel 111 on mac,but the processes grow slightly every request.On my production server running debian,I've got ruby 1.8.5 from 2006-08-25,and because

[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2008-10-13 Thread Alex Gregianin
Does patchlevel 111 have the same problem as well? I've been running ruby 1.8.6 patchlevel 111 on mac,but the processes grow slightly every request.On my production server running debian,I've got ruby 1.8.5 from 2006-08-25,and because I've got a lot of traffic on my production server,memory

[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2008-10-12 Thread tonypm
Thanks Fred, Fedora updated Ruby to: ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [i386-linux] problems now all gone away - much relieved!! Tonypm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk

[Rails] Re: Memory Leak

2008-10-09 Thread Frederick Cheung
On 9 Oct 2008, at 08:59, tonypm wrote: Sorry I don't have an answer for you at the moment, but I would make the same request. I have recently started to experience serious memory leaks in my two live apps (running on different servers). I am using lighttpd and fastcgi on Fedora 8 and 9.

[Rails] Re: Memory leak problem

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Sofaer
Probably not related, but should business.save at the end there be @business.save? On Oct 8, 9:39 am, elioncho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a txt file with some data that i need to import to de database. I'm using ruby to import those data but i have a major problem, when i 've a large