If you are finding yourself having to switch between some of the
applications just to get a simple task done then those applications,
at least, would do well to be merged.
But beware at the other end we have some applications that have
evolved over time to the extent that we are looking to break t
On 17 January 2012 13:40, jsnark wrote:
> It was easier to develop each app independent of the others. When I
> found that I was duplicating code in models, I created a gem that
> contains the common methods. I'm now wondering if it would be better
> to have a single large app. For one thing, i
It was easier to develop each app independent of the others. When I
found that I was duplicating code in models, I created a gem that
contains the common methods. I'm now wondering if it would be better
to have a single large app. For one thing, it would make navigating
between the apps easier.
just for me to get it.. why did you separeted in mini apps in the first
place? What motivaded you? What were the reasons that led you to do that?
2012/1/16 jsnark
> What additional information do you need? What are the tradeoffs?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to
What additional information do you need? What are the tradeoffs?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyo
5 matches
Mail list logo
