On Oct 13, 2:24 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Then you want something like
>
> def status=(value)
> new_value = do_something_to(value)
> self[:status] = new_value # assuming this class is derived from AR
> end
>
> The reason your attempt to do status = value didn't work is that it was
> ju
Joshua Partogi wrote:
> Hi Marnen
>
>
> On Oct 12, 3:04 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser
> wrote:
>> > hoping that this accessors would be able to set or change the value of
>> > :status. But the behaviours doesn't seems to be like that.
>>
>> It can be, but you'll have to do it slightly differently. I
Hi Marnen
On Oct 12, 3:04 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Joshua Partogi wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 10:31 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser
> > wrote:
> >> > end
>
> >> This won't quite work. But before I try to improve it...what are you
> >> trying to do? Set status to P no matter the argument that the f
Joshua Partogi wrote:
> On Oct 12, 10:31 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser
> wrote:
>> > end
>>
>> This won't quite work. But before I try to improve it...what are you
>> trying to do? Set status to P no matter the argument that the function
>> is called with?
>>
>
> Well there are more logic there actu
On Oct 12, 10:31 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Joshua Partogi wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > Coming from the Java & Hibernate world, I was confused when trying out
> > this piece of line of code:
> > class Task < ActiveRecord::Base
> > def status=(status)
> > status = 'P'
> > write_attribu
Joshua Partogi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Coming from the Java & Hibernate world, I was confused when trying out
> this piece of line of code:
> class Task < ActiveRecord::Base
> def status=(status)
> status = 'P'
> write_attribute(:status, status)
> end
> end
This won't quite work. But b
6 matches
Mail list logo
