Re: [Rails] Re: Persistent objects

2010-03-27 Thread Colin Law
On 27 March 2010 18:13, Erik Lindblad wrote: > Excellent, you are right. I thought I tried that but I have tried many > combinations so I must have done it for something that was not > persistent in itself. @@variable worked when in production mode. You > made me a very happy camper. As a matter

[Rails] Re: Persistent objects

2010-03-27 Thread Erik Lindblad
Excellent, you are right. I thought I tried that but I have tried many combinations so I must have done it for something that was not persistent in itself. @@variable worked when in production mode. You made me a very happy camper. Thanks. Erik On 27 mar, 19:03, Frederick Cheung wrote: > On Ma

[Rails] Re: Persistent objects

2010-03-27 Thread Frederick Cheung
On Mar 27, 5:33 pm, Erik Lindblad wrote: > Hi Colin and thanks for the suggestion. But the problem is more > intricate than this, I am afraid. The reason I want to keep the object > is that it connects via sockets to a pool of servers (at least 4 of > them). When the object is marshaled, either

[Rails] Re: Persistent objects

2010-03-27 Thread Erik Lindblad
Hi Colin and thanks for the suggestion. But the problem is more intricate than this, I am afraid. The reason I want to keep the object is that it connects via sockets to a pool of servers (at least 4 of them). When the object is marshaled, either for storage in the session or in the db these connec