Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Best way to handle multiple tables to replace one bi

2010-04-26 Thread Michael Pavling
On 26 April 2010 02:08, Mike P. wrote: > So, I'm trying to get the fuel before starting, not when I absolutely > need it. I think it seems to some that what you might be doing is filling the back seats of your car with jerry cans full of fuel when all you're doing is popping down the road to pick

Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Best way to handle multiple tables to replace one bi

2010-04-26 Thread Colin Law
On 26 April 2010 02:08, Mike P. wrote: > Thank you Colin and Marnen for your repsonses. > > Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> Colin Law wrote: >>> On 25 April 2010 00:45, Mike P. wrote: ... I think if people could just get over the "don't optimize too early" mantra, and realize that thi

[Rails] Re: Re: Best way to handle multiple tables to replace one bi

2010-04-25 Thread Mike P.
Thank you Colin and Marnen for your repsonses. Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Colin Law wrote: >> On 25 April 2010 00:45, Mike P. wrote: >>>... >>> I think if people could just get over the "don't optimize too early" >>> mantra, and realize that this can't possibly be best move for everyone, >>> a

[Rails] Re: Re: Best way to handle multiple tables to replace one bi

2010-04-25 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Colin Law wrote: > On 25 April 2010 00:45, Mike P. wrote: >>... >> I think if people could just get over the "don't optimize too early" >> mantra, and realize that this can't possibly be best move for everyone, >> a lot of future stress could be avoided, for both the business owner and >> the cust