Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Re: Editing Migrations table

2010-06-22 Thread Bill Walton
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Bill Walton wrote: >> Hi Marnen, >> >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser >> wrote: >>> Bill Walton wrote: IME, there are good reasons to avoid time-stamped migrations. >>> >>> Not a one IMHO. >> >> You are certa

[Rails] Re: Re: Re: Editing Migrations table

2010-06-22 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Bill Walton wrote: > Hi Marnen, > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: >> Bill Walton wrote: >>> IME, there are good reasons to avoid time-stamped migrations. >> >> Not a one IMHO. > > You are certainly entitled to your opinion. But knowing as I do that > you have no

[Rails] Re: Re: Re: Editing Migrations table

2010-06-22 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Bill Walton wrote: > Hi Marnen, > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: >> Bill Walton wrote: >>> IME, there are good reasons to avoid time-stamped migrations. >> >> Not a one IMHO. > > You are certainly entitled to your opinion. But knowing as I do that > you have no