Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #970168:
And so have I. But as I said. I'm not a natural programmer. But I try to
be a software developer and I think Rails is much easier to use than e g
php. Hopefully it will stay that way.
Actually that should be web developer. A bit tired when I wrote that
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969907:
Just kidding. I see your point. I'm kind of full with knowledge. I'm
tired of always having to learn new things. Once I was eager to do so,
but not anymore.
I had a good life with Rails 2. Things worked well and I felt I had
learned all I needed to have
Robert Walker wrote in post #970096:
If you have a problem learning new ways to do things, then you probably
made a mistake choosing Rails. Maybe even a mistake in becoming a
software developer in the first place.
No problem at all. I like to live on the edge. Over the years I've
become more
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Paul Bergstrom li...@ruby-forum.comwrote:
Robert Walker wrote in post #970096:
If you have a problem learning new ways to do things, then you probably
made a mistake choosing Rails. Maybe even a mistake in becoming a
software developer in the first place.
David Kahn wrote in post #969902:
[...]
I
have
ended up dropping Cucumber for Steak and this has helped.
[...]
Now that's just a terrible idea. I don't want to hijack this thread,
but I'll be happy to discuss (in a different thread) why I think Steak
is fundamentally misconceived.
Best,
--
David Kahn wrote in post #969902:
Rspec, Cucumber, Capybara, xpath and who knows what else at the same
time
I get exhausted of hearing about all that stuff :-)
Just kidding. I see your point. I'm kind of full with knowledge. I'm
tired of always having to learn new things. Once I was eager to
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969907:
David Kahn wrote in post #969902:
Rspec, Cucumber, Capybara, xpath and who knows what else at the same
time
I get exhausted of hearing about all that stuff :-)
Just kidding. I see your point. I'm kind of full with knowledge. I'm
tired of always having
David Kahn wrote in post #969902:
Btw, thanks for the input and you effort to help.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969909:
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969907:
Then please stick with your old configuration. Trying to learn Rails 3
and make it work just like Rails 2 is an exercise in futility. To learn
new stuff, you have to *learn* *new* stuff.
You just don't get
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969914:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969909:
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969907:
Then please stick with your old configuration. Trying to learn Rails 3
and make it work just like Rails 2 is an exercise in futility. To learn
new stuff, you have to
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969916:
You just don't get it.
Funny, I'd say the same to you. What do you think I don't get?
How to behave.
Listen to yourself, to you answers.
--
Me: Can I still use require somewhere without bundler?
--
--
You: It hasn't been easy for you because
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969924:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969916:
You just don't get it.
Funny, I'd say the same to you. What do you think I don't get?
How to behave.
Listen to yourself, to you answers.
[...]
I've written nothing that I'd consider inappropriate --
No, you can't.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 20:17, Marnen Laibow-Koser li...@ruby-forum.comwrote:
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969914:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969909:
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969907:
Then please stick with your old configuration. Trying to learn Rails 3
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #969928:
Paul Bergstrom wrote in post #969924:
I've written nothing that I'd consider inappropriate -- nothing that I'd
have any problem receiving as a response from someone else. Obviously,
your standards are different. That's OK -- no two people think
14 matches
Mail list logo
