Oh,I See
Thanks very much for you help again.I am study ruby & ROR from
yesterday,I try rails 2.3.3 now
BTW,I am chinese,My English is so poor,if have some mistake in
English,please don't care ~ ^_^
On 9月25日, 上午1时58分, Frederick Cheung
wrote:
> On Sep 24, 6:55 pm, ouwsh wrote:
>
> > oh,Thank f
On Sep 24, 6:55 pm, ouwsh wrote:
> oh,Thank for you help,
>
> Do you know how to fix this bug with ruby 1.9.1 on rails 2.3.4 ? Just
> on way I choose rails 2.3.2 or older?
>
downgrading to 2.3.3 probably the easiest thing.
Fred
> On 9月24日, 下午7时45分, Frederick Cheung
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep
oh,Thank for you help,
Do you know how to fix this bug with ruby 1.9.1 on rails 2.3.4 ? Just
on way I choose rails 2.3.2 or older?
On 9月24日, 下午7时45分, Frederick Cheung
wrote:
> On Sep 24, 11:16 am, ouwsh wrote:
>
> > My computer build on windows Ruby 1.9.1 ，rails 2.3.4 mysql
>
> It's a bug i
On Sep 24, 11:16 am, ouwsh wrote:
> My computer build on windows Ruby 1.9.1 ，rails 2.3.4 mysql
>
It's a bug in rails 2.3.4
Fred
> I am follow agile_web_development_with_rails_3rd_edition book to build
> my site
>
> ruby script/generate scaffold recipe title:string author:string
> descripti
Hi
Read this thread
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/189637
Sijo
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send
I use stow to have Ruby 1.8.6, 1.8.7, and 1.9 all on the same machine.
Only 1 can be used at any one time, and you have to install each gem
(including rails) separately for each version of Ruby.
Here is a tutorial:
http://www.mjwall.com/2008/08/multiple-versions-of-ruby-with-stow/
HTH
Paul
Rub
Phlip wrote:
[...]
> Next question: Is Rails 1.9 ready yet?
You mean Rails 2.3 on Ruby 1.9? That is said to work, but not all
plugins and gems will (never tried it myself). See
http://isitruby19.com .
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://
RubyNewbie wrote:
> Our company is running Ruby 1.8.6 patch 111. Is it possible to
> install Ruby 1.9.1 on the same machines to test the same application?
> If so what is the recommended strategy for having side-by-side
> installations and how would you specify which version of Ruby and
> Rails
Thanks alot mate, was waiting for this.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@go
Hi Rohit,
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:42 +0200, Rohit Chauhan wrote:
> -
> Latest Ruby 1.9.1 One-Click Installer with No-Hassle Rails Installation
> ---
Hi ZhayTee,
It sounds like ruby 1.9.1 isn't being used to run your app. Make sure
all symlinks to the ruby interpret point to 1.9. Also, you will need
to reinstall gem with ruby 1.9.1 and then re-download and install the
rails gems with the new gem install for 1.9.
Worked for us.
Cheers,
George
Steve, try freezing your rails gems before starting the server and let
me know what happens.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
T
ZhayTee wrote:
> Unfortunately, Rails itself fails to function. Running the "rails"
> script fails with the following error:
>
> :234:in `push_gem_version_on_load_path': Could
> not find RubyGem activesupport (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
I installed Rails 2.3.2 and Ruby 1.9.1 (from source) with no p
I'm running:
Mac OSX V 10.5.7
1.25 GHz PPC G4
I've successfully built ruby-1.8.[67]p"72-160", ruby-1.9.1p"0-129",
and ruby-1.9.2dev(many versions).
cd ruby-1...
./configure --prefix=/opt/... --enable-pthread
make
make install
Is it possible your "autoconf" step is tripping you up? Or is it
po
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Freddy Andersen wrote:
>
> cd ruby-1.9.1-p129
> autoconf
> ./configure --program-suffix=19
>
> checking whether ELF binaries are produced... no
> checking whether OS depend dynamic link works... In file included
> from /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:26,
>
Tried stable-snapshot and snapshot both has the same issue
Just as a test I tried 1.8.7-p160 and that works and installs fine (./
configure, make, make install)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R
Thanks for the tip. I already have that package installed so the
problem might be that my private (/opt/ruby.../) copy of ruby didn't
see or detect the iconv stuff when I built it from the source code.
I don't see the ruby-iconv package on cygwin so there must be another
package or build option
simply install ruby-iconv
(http://john.vipvip.com/blog/?p=71)
On 26 май, 22:21, dmack wrote:
> I tried to get this working and ran into a problem:
>
> - latest cygwin
> - ruby 1.9.1p129 (same problem with p0). install in /opt/ruby19
> - rails 2.3.2
>
> 1) Installed ruby 1.9.1p129 with: --
I'm not having trouble installing rails. Ruby 1.9.1 came with its own
copy of the gem binary which I have all installed in a separate
hierarchy. But, when I run the rails command to create a new test
application, that's when I get the undefined method camelize for
app:String
I have googled arou
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2009, at 12:21 PM, dmack
wrote:
>
> I tried to get this working and ran into a problem:
>
> - latest cygwin
> - ruby 1.9.1p129 (same problem with p0). install in /opt/ruby19
> - rails 2.3.2
>
> 1) Installed ruby 1.9.1p129 with: --prefix=/opt/ruby19. No er
Just a little update. Right now I have the mysql, pg, hpricot and thin
gems running on this setup. The guide is on the post that I posted
earlier: http://frozenplague.net/2009/01/ruby-191-rubygems-rails/.
There are no forseeable problems that stand out to me, everything
appears to run fine for me.
Holy thread resurrection batman!
You need to be using edge rails.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
T
Ryan Bigg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning I sat down and nutted out a way of getting Rails 2.3 to
> play nicely with Ruby 1.9.1. Here's a guide so you can do the same:
> http://frozenplague.net/2009/01/ruby-191-rubygems-rails/
> -
> Ryan Bigg
"When installing the latest Rubygems 1.3.1 it wi
Hi
This time db:migrate did work, but then i got this error:
C:\Settings\user\My Documents\NetBeansProjects\urdu_words>c:
\Ruby-1.9.1\bin\ruby script/server
c:/Ruby-1.9.1/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.2.2/lib/
active_support/dependencies.rb:153:in `require': no such file to load
-- t
Ok thank you, i will do that.
On Jan 12, 1:37 pm, NAYAK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you run it with trace enabled (--trace)
> Please share the error trace so that others can help you
>
> NAYAK
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:16 PM, safestate wrote:
>
> > I can't get rake tasks to work properly using Rub
Hi,
Did you run it with trace enabled (--trace)
Please share the error trace so that others can help you
NAYAK
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:16 PM, safestate wrote:
>
> I can't get rake tasks to work properly using Ruby 1.9.1 with Windows
>
> I have set up all the gems for Rails 2.2.2, "rails mya
26 matches
Mail list logo
