See, I don't htink there IS an easier way -- just a Ruby-occluded way
called .find_by_sql([select ...])
A lot of this syntactic sugar really gets in the way. Rails is great,
as a web framework -- far superior to something like Struts. But in
the end, it;s back to JRuby, writing the back end in
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, RVince wrote:
See, I don't htink there IS an easier way -- just a Ruby-occluded way
called .find_by_sql([select ...])
A lot of this syntactic sugar really gets in the way. Rails is great,
as a web framework -- far superior to something like Struts. But in
the end, it;s
Yes, ORMs are wonderful, once you learn the abstraction layer. But --
and I know some will take offense at this -- there are things to avoid
in learning Ruby, and just use the old tried-n-true (many things, like
using straight Javascript for most of the Ajax-like things you want to
do, or for
On Nov 22, 4:10 pm, RVince rvinc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes, ORMs are wonderful, once you learn the abstraction layer. But --
and I know some will take offense at this -- there are things to avoid
in learning Ruby, and just use the old tried-n-true (many things, like
using straight Javascript
4 matches
Mail list logo
