[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-10-01 Thread Colin Law
2009/10/1 Robert Walker : > > Mauricio Szabo wrote: > >> But if you require 'open-uri': >> require 'open-uri' >> => true open("http://example.com/";).read >> => "\r\n\r\n  Example Web Page\r\n \r >> \n  \r\nYou have reached this web page by >> typing"example.com",\r\n"example.net",\r\n  

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Greg Donald
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Robert Walker wrote: > Wow! This is a bad idea. Including a full page inside another page just > makes my skin crawl. If I absolutely had to do something like this I > would maybe grab the page using open(...), but then strip out only the > contents inside the bod

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Robert Walker
Mauricio Szabo wrote: > But if you require 'open-uri': > >>> require 'open-uri' > => true >>> open("http://example.com/";).read > => "\r\n\r\n Example Web Page\r\n \r > \n \r\nYou have reached this web page by > typing"example.com",\r\n"example.net",\r\n or > "example.org" into your web brows

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
Right on, that worked for me. Thanx so much! On Sep 30, 12:16 pm, Mauricio Szabo wrote: > You must require 'open-uri' to be able to open URLS. For example: > > >> open("http://example.com/";).read > > Errno::ENOENT: No such file or directory -http://example.com/ >         from (irb):2:in `initia

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Mauricio Szabo
You must require 'open-uri' to be able to open URLS. For example: >> open("http://example.com/";).read Errno::ENOENT: No such file or directory - http://example.com/ from (irb):2:in `initialize' from (irb):2:in `open' from (irb):2 But if you require 'open-uri': >> requi

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Eric Gruber wrote: > What happened was I got the "We're sorry, but something went wrong." > page from my > app. Yes, that's all you will get on the screen in dev mode. What's in the log? > > I would prefer it all to be on one server, but the company I'm trying > to do this for has many differ

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
What happened was I got the "We're sorry, but something went wrong." page from my app. I would prefer it all to be on one server, but the company I'm trying to do this for has many different projects, using different languages on two different servers. I'd rather not include a copy on the second

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
What happened was I got the "We're sorry, but something went wrong." page from my app. I would prefer it all to be on one server, but the company I'm trying to do this for has many different projects, using different languages on two different servers. I'd rather not include a copy on the second

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Eric Gruber wrote: > If there's some sort of risk, please inform. I agree, this is a terrible idea from both performance and architectural perspectives. Why do you want your navbar to live on another server? > > Not that it matters, that didn't work either. What happened when you tried the o

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
I should clarify. 1. I control both servers that I'm working with, so the security risk is practically nil. 2. The app is very small. Any performance hits I'd take by including a remote file is acceptable. That said, still don't have a fix. Thanx. Eric On Sep 30, 11:17 am, Eric Gruber wrote:

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
If there's some sort of risk, please inform. Not that it matters, that didn't work either. On Sep 30, 11:13 am, John Barnette wrote: > On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Eric Gruber wrote: > > > OK ... so is there another way to do it without using render? > > > Surely this isn't something that PHP c

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread John Barnette
On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Eric Gruber wrote: > OK ... so is there another way to do it without using render? > > Surely this isn't something that PHP can do that Rails can't. This is a terrible idea. But hey, here, have a loaded gun: <%= open("http://example.com/navigation.html";).read %> ~

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
OK ... so is there another way to do it without using render? Surely this isn't something that PHP can do that Rails can't. On Sep 30, 11:04 am, Eric Gruber wrote: > Right. That helps if the file I am using is locally. But what do I do > if that file is from another server? > > On Sep 30, 11:02

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
Right. That helps if the file I am using is locally. But what do I do if that file is from another server? On Sep 30, 11:02 am, Greg Donald wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Eric Gruber wrote: > > <%= render :partial => 'http://example.com/navigation.html'%> > > The partial file should

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Jason Roelofs
You can't do that. render works only with files local to your app. Jason On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Eric Gruber wrote: > > I tried that, with something like this: > > > <%= render :partial => 'http://example.com/navigation.html' %> > > And I got the "We're sorry, but something went wrong

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Greg Donald
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Eric Gruber wrote: > <%= render :partial => 'http://example.com/navigation.html' %> The partial file should be local to the Rails app. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Eric Gruber
I tried that, with something like this: <%= render :partial => 'http://example.com/navigation.html' %> And I got the "We're sorry, but something went wrong." page from my app. I am 100% positive the server I'm trying to include the file from allows files to re used remotely. On Sep 30, 10:48

[Rails] Re: What is the Ruby on Rails equivalent to php includes?

2009-09-30 Thread Greg Donald
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Eric J. Gruber wrote: > > If I was to include a file (such as in a template) in php to use > across a large number of pages, I would write this: > > > In turn, every time I used this code, it would “include” (or better > put, display) the content of navigation.h