Cool. Thanks for that. I've never heard of it before. I'll try it this
weekend.

Regards,

On Feb 12, 11:48 am, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Joshua Partogi
> > <joshua.part...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don't want to use that
> > > in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as
> > > I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these
> > > days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest
> > > experience on this?
>
> > > Thank you very much for the insights.
>
> > For production I'd use Passenger (a.k.a. modrails) with Ruby 1.9.
> > Should work fine with Rails3 since it drives the rack interface.
>
> DHH recommends Passenger 2.2.9 if you decide to use it with Rails
> 3.0.
>
> -Conrad
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to