Cool. Thanks for that. I've never heard of it before. I'll try it this weekend.
Regards, On Feb 12, 11:48 am, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Joshua Partogi > > <joshua.part...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In development I used webrick, but I suppose I don't want to use that > > > in production. With rails2 I would use mongrel or thin. But as far as > > > I know, mongrel is no longer developed? So are we left to thin these > > > days? Does thin plays nicely with Rails3? What is your latest > > > experience on this? > > > > Thank you very much for the insights. > > > For production I'd use Passenger (a.k.a. modrails) with Ruby 1.9. > > Should work fine with Rails3 since it drives the rack interface. > > DHH recommends Passenger 2.2.9 if you decide to use it with Rails > 3.0. > > -Conrad > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.