I'm not sure if we can say that there are any standards at all. You should just check what fits for your needs best: transitions declaration, callbacks, state checking interfaces etc. Last time I was implementing state machine I chose AASM after trying several other also just cos it fit to my needs best. Just try to test at least a couple of gems it doesn't actually take a lot of time, but you'll make your own opinion.
On Feb 1, 12:01 am, Karl Smith <threadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > A few years back I used AASM. More recently, I just build state > functionally by hand on an as needed basis. So I check out > rubygems.org and low-and-behold there are many offerings. > > Here is a > sampling:http://rubygems.org/gems/state_machinehttp://rubygems.org/gems/aasmhttp://rubygems.org/gems/acts_as_state_machinehttp://rubygems.org/gems/statemachine > or all of them:http://rubygems.org/search?utf8=✓&query=state+machine > > My question is... which one is considered the current "standard" in > state machine gems for rails 3? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
