Thanks - it may have only been a short time, but I was missing the
guides.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Good news. Thank you.
On 21 April 2010 16:05, Shiv Narayan Gautam wrote:
> DHH just tweeted saying that the domain is back up. Waiting for all the DNS
> servers to cache it. And the domain is registered for 10 years.
> So there you go Amala. Happy now :)
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Mo
DHH just tweeted saying that the domain is back up. Waiting for all the DNS
servers to cache it. And the domain is registered for 10 years.
So there you go Amala. Happy now :)
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Moo wrote:
> > Pointless remark? Ha. Cant this be avoided for the second time if not fo
> Pointless remark? Ha. Cant this be avoided for the second time if not for
> the first time?
> I dont still believe this it could happen to ROR.
it's not the freaking rails framework man. it's the domain name
registrar.
On Apr 21, 7:39 am, Amala Singh wrote:
> Pointless remark? Ha. Cant this be
Pointless remark? Ha. Cant this be avoided for the second time if not for
the first time?
I dont still believe this it could happen to ROR.
On 21 April 2010 15:26, Peter De Berdt wrote:
>
> On 21 Apr 2010, at 14:56, Amala Singh wrote:
>
> This is a sign of ROR losing credibility. It is such a sh
On 21 Apr 2010, at 14:56, Amala Singh wrote:
This is a sign of ROR losing credibility. It is such a shame that it
has happened to
a wonderful innovation. Why they are going for RoR3 and so on, if
they cannot
maintain the existing things better?
What a pointless remark. 37signals paid the
This is a sign of ROR losing credibility. It is such a shame that it has
happened to
a wonderful innovation. Why they are going for RoR3 and so on, if they
cannot
maintain the existing things better?
On 21 April 2010 13:18, Rick wrote:
> Any idea on how long it takes to recover from this annual
Any idea on how long it takes to recover from this annual screw-up?
Eyecandy and grublinks are no substitute for a productive community
site.
Rick
On Apr 21, 2:13 am, Frederick Cheung
wrote:
> On Apr 21, 12:28 am, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
>
> > Go here and download whatever set of rdocs you need
On Apr 21, 12:28 am, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> Go here and download whatever set of rdocs you need... then you don't
> have to worry about the official site anymore :)
>
or generate the docs locally (rake doc:rails) like that you don't have
to worry about having an internet connection
> http:
Go here and download whatever set of rdocs you need... then you don't
have to worry about the official site anymore :)
http://railsapi.com/
On Apr 20, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Moo wrote:
API doesn't work with .com
On Apr 20, 3:12 pm, jhaagmans wrote:
You can use rubyonrails.com now.
On Apr 20,
API doesn't work with .com
On Apr 20, 3:12 pm, jhaagmans wrote:
> You can use rubyonrails.com now.
>
> On Apr 20, 10:11 pm, dan wrote:
>
> > is there a direct ip for ruby rails site?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk
You can use rubyonrails.com now.
On Apr 20, 10:11 pm, dan wrote:
> is there a direct ip for ruby rails site?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
is there a direct ip for ruby rails site?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@
On Apr 20, 4:57 pm, dkindlund wrote:
> All,
>
> Visitinghttp://api.rubyonrails.orgnow redirects to an domain
> squatter page.
>
> If you're not seeing it (probably because the original site may still
> be cached by an upstream proxy), look at CorelCDN's cached version of
> the page:
This seems
14 matches
Mail list logo
