I'd bet I'm not the only one waiting to see your beautiful code. ;p
Pepe
On Jul 29, 4:18 am, Rakoth wrote:
> difficult to provide anything more ugly
>
> > for tax in @taxes
> > next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
> > print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid +
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 19:30 +0200, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> [...]
> > yes, thanks...the .include? worked
>
> Great.
>
> > where the comparison operator === did
> > not work for me (or at least I gave up trying)
>
> Why do you say it still didn't work? I explained in m
Craig White wrote:
[...]
> yes, thanks...the .include? worked
Great.
> where the comparison operator === did
> not work for me (or at least I gave up trying)
Why do you say it still didn't work? I explained in my previous message
*exactly* how to get === to work. Please read text, not just
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 17:14 +0200, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > Even my pickaxe book suggests this should work but it doesn't...
> >
> > for tax in @taxes
> > next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
> > print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid
Craig White wrote:
> Even my pickaxe book suggests this should work but it doesn't...
>
> for tax in @taxes
> next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
> print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid + "\n"
> end
>
> and my thinking is that if the tax.taxauthid is not fou
In most cases that I see (according to the Pickaxe) this is "Case
Equality" that is just a synonym to ==.
On Jul 29, 3:00 am, Josh wrote:
> I may be posting this twice, sorry if thats the case...
>
> Question, what is the difference between === and ==
>
--~--~-~--~~~
If I understand correctly, you'd like to output some information about
a selected group of taxes.
How about something like:
selected = @taxes.select { |tax| [24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38,
39].include? tax.taxauthid }
selected.each { |tax| puts "#{tax.taxamount} - #{tax.taxauthid}" }
Bryan
--~--
difficult to provide anything more ugly
> for tax in @taxes
> next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
> print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid + "\n"
> end
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
I may be posting this twice, sorry if thats the case...
Question, what is the difference between === and ==
If I were writing this I would write it with the member? method of
array and avoid the next statement and the negation to make it as
readable as possible.
@taxes.each do |tax|
if [24,
I am not familiar with 'triple equals' what is the difference between
=== and ==
If I were doing the same thing I'd write it
@taxes.each do |tax|
for tax in @taxes
next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid + "\n"
end
On Jul
> 2009/7/29 Craig White :
>>
>> Even my pickaxe book suggests this should work but it doesn't...
>>
>> for tax in @taxes
>> next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
>> print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid + "\n"
>> end
Hello Craig,
Why don't you use the include? m
2009/7/29 Craig White :
>
> Even my pickaxe book suggests this should work but it doesn't...
>
> for tax in @taxes
> next if ! (tax.taxauthid === [ 24, 25, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39])
> print tax.taxamount + " - " + tax.taxauthid + "\n"
> end
>
> and my thinking is that if the tax.taxauthid is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
