Re: [rules-dev] [vote] Module drools-atom in limbo

2010-10-27 Thread Jervis Liu
Michael Neale wrote: > I don't think it is used or needed. Can archive it off unless anyone > says otherwise. > > Yes, its a dead code. We can safely remove it. Jervis > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Geoffrey De Smet > mailto:ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I am looking at cleaning

Re: [rules-dev] Left and Right Unlinking - Community Project Proposal

2010-10-27 Thread Leonardo Gomes
Hi Mark, Shame on me... I didn't actually do a lot of progress, but I'm still willing to do it. I was sort of waiting for the whole RuleFest thing finish, so that I could bother you guys with questions on IRC. I will try to get in touch with you tomorrow. Leo. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:46 P

Re: [rules-dev] [vote] Module drools-assistent moved into drools-ide-common

2010-10-27 Thread Lucas Amador
Good idea, I agree. On 27 October 2010 19:41, Michael Neale wrote: > agree - although "ide" in the name implies it is not for web tools ? > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Geoffrey De Smet > wrote: > >> If drools-assistent needs to be implemented in guvnor and the eclipse >> plugin, >> it

Re: [rules-dev] [vote] Module drools-assistent moved into drools-ide-common

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Neale
agree - although "ide" in the name implies it is not for web tools ? On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > If drools-assistent needs to be implemented in guvnor and the eclipse > plugin, > it should be added to drools-ide-common IIRC :) > > Op 27-10-10 07:42, Lucas Amador sch

Re: [rules-dev] drools-guvnor jiras are moved from JBRULES to GUVNOR

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Neale
oh - I am used to it ;) my mail filters are well trained. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Toni Rikkola wrote: > Hi, > > >From now on there is only one location for Jiras related to Guvnor. > JBRULES/drools-guvnor is being removed and the Jira issues are moved to > GUVNOR [1]. > > I also wanted

Re: [rules-dev] Left and Right Unlinking - Community Project Proposal

2010-10-27 Thread Mark Proctor
Anyone made progress on this? Mark On 20/08/2010 17:02, Mark Proctor wrote: In an effort to help encourage those thinking of learning more about the internals of rule engines. I have made a document on implementating left and right unlinking. I describe the initial paper in terms relevant to D

Re: [rules-dev] Maven profiles (making maven faster and build more): change propositions

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Anstis
Standardisation and simplification. Great. For my benefit, what's considered the soa stuff? I'd be interested in how you manage to get GWT to compile less (i.e. presumably no cross-browser or internationalisation support) for the default profile; as it uses the .gwt.xml file to determine what to

Re: [rules-dev] Modules description on the wiki or in the pom.xml description?

2010-10-27 Thread Mark Proctor
On 27/10/2010 07:54, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > >>> I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the Wiki a > >>> summary of what each project represents and what package (JAR) > >>> they bundle into. > > Imho, this summary is better put in the pom.xml's entity, > inst

Re: [rules-dev] [vote] Module drools-atom in limbo

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Anstis
No problem, I'll put comments in the pom files (at Geoffrey's suggestion). How do I go about getting commit permissions on svn; or would you rather me provide patches for now? Geoffrey, would you rather me defer this until you've made your other maven changes? Cheers, Mike On 27 October 2010 0

Re: [rules-dev] [rules-users] Starting engine using fireUntilHalt and inserting no facts results in 50% CPU usage

2010-10-27 Thread Greg Barton
Yep. :) I always propose minimal change solutions first, but having the single flag is best in this case. GreG On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:22, Edson Tirelli wrote: Hi Greg, Thanks for the excellent analysis and the help. I agree with your findings. For a solution though, I was thinking abou

Re: [rules-dev] Maven profiles (making maven faster and build more): change propositions

2010-10-27 Thread Edson Tirelli
Hey Geoffrey, It all sounds good, except for the antlr generation. My experience with it in the past was that sometimes, for no apparent reason*, the parser would break when regenerated and no one would know why. So, I would like to keep the antlr generation non-automatic, and the generated

[rules-dev] drools-guvnor jiras are moved from JBRULES to GUVNOR

2010-10-27 Thread Toni Rikkola
Hi, >From now on there is only one location for Jiras related to Guvnor. >JBRULES/drools-guvnor is being removed and the Jira issues are moved to GUVNOR >[1]. I also wanted to warn and apologize you about the Jira spam some of you will soon get. Jira sends emails about the move to everybody fo

Re: [rules-dev] Maven profiles (making maven faster and build more): change propositions

2010-10-27 Thread Ming Fang
+1 This will be great. On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > I 'd like to refactor the maven build to use exactly 3 profiles and remove > all other profiles: > default > Fast, for during development > full > Slow, but builds everything. Used by hudson, releases and before you go

[rules-dev] Maven profiles (making maven faster and build more): change propositions

2010-10-27 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
I 'd like to refactor the maven build to use exactly 3 profiles and remove all other profiles: default Fast, for during development full Slow, but builds everything. Used by hudson, releases and before you go to sleep